Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Recruiting analysis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takethepoints" data-source="post: 476828" data-attributes="member: 265"><p>You need to read the analysis again. I <em>never</em> said that star rankings are valid; I said they were the best I could do and much better then the overall ranking (sorry, RiseUp; I suppose we disagree) when comparing over years. I <em>never</em> said that Purdue and Rice were "in a better position then we are"; what I said is that they are like Tech in that they are like us in terms of image and curriculum.</p><p></p><p>Oth, I also pointed out that VT wasn't actually directly comparable. I put them in there because they <em>are</em> a tech school. I agree they have the highest ceiling, with Pitt and Tech close behind. </p><p></p><p>As I bet you do, I wish the stat resources were up to a <em>real</em> analysis on this. Why they aren't is a question. I think there isn't much incentive for the people who do this as a business to do much more. It may need a Bill James to come up with the insight to do it.</p><p></p><p>Update: Purdue 48, OSU 20 with 2:30 to go! BOILER UP! HAMMER DOWN!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takethepoints, post: 476828, member: 265"] You need to read the analysis again. I [I]never[/I] said that star rankings are valid; I said they were the best I could do and much better then the overall ranking (sorry, RiseUp; I suppose we disagree) when comparing over years. I [I]never[/I] said that Purdue and Rice were "in a better position then we are"; what I said is that they are like Tech in that they are like us in terms of image and curriculum. Oth, I also pointed out that VT wasn't actually directly comparable. I put them in there because they [I]are[/I] a tech school. I agree they have the highest ceiling, with Pitt and Tech close behind. As I bet you do, I wish the stat resources were up to a [I]real[/I] analysis on this. Why they aren't is a question. I think there isn't much incentive for the people who do this as a business to do much more. It may need a Bill James to come up with the insight to do it. Update: Purdue 48, OSU 20 with 2:30 to go! BOILER UP! HAMMER DOWN! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Recruiting analysis
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top