Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Raw Data on Recruiting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Boaty1" data-source="post: 507134" data-attributes="member: 2631"><p>It seems like you are wanting to draw conclusions about our expectations based on the hard data you have supplied. I don’t know why else you would post it. So the issue at hand is are the Gailey years a reasonable standard to gauge the success or lack thereof of Johnson on the recruiting trail? I’m arguing the answer is no. And seeing how most who support Johnson do so because of our perceived inability to recruit at a high level this is a really important conversation and the reason I speak up on this topic more than any other. If I am correct about the strength of recruiting pre Gailey the curriculum argument for example gets demolished as our curriculum has not changed in the past 3 decades. Same goes for our smaller fanbase. Admittedly others such as funding of the program still stand.</p><p></p><p>As far as my evidence being anecdotal I wish I had more. I wish it was easier to pull this data together but I remember those classes and have provided some evidence even if we would both like more. Seeing how I provided more evidence than anyone here I think my position is the most solid. I would welcome any evidence regardless of how questionable it is that disputed my claim. So far none has surfaced.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Boaty1, post: 507134, member: 2631"] It seems like you are wanting to draw conclusions about our expectations based on the hard data you have supplied. I don’t know why else you would post it. So the issue at hand is are the Gailey years a reasonable standard to gauge the success or lack thereof of Johnson on the recruiting trail? I’m arguing the answer is no. And seeing how most who support Johnson do so because of our perceived inability to recruit at a high level this is a really important conversation and the reason I speak up on this topic more than any other. If I am correct about the strength of recruiting pre Gailey the curriculum argument for example gets demolished as our curriculum has not changed in the past 3 decades. Same goes for our smaller fanbase. Admittedly others such as funding of the program still stand. As far as my evidence being anecdotal I wish I had more. I wish it was easier to pull this data together but I remember those classes and have provided some evidence even if we would both like more. Seeing how I provided more evidence than anyone here I think my position is the most solid. I would welcome any evidence regardless of how questionable it is that disputed my claim. So far none has surfaced. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Raw Data on Recruiting
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top