Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Raw Data on Recruiting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Augusta_Jacket" data-source="post: 505507" data-attributes="member: 1191"><p>As I said, I was initially disappointed in the hire of CPJ. I was operating under the assumption that CCG would hopefully land another class like 2007 in 2009, as the 2008 class, while nice, wasn't in the same neighborhood. I assumed that premier RBs and WRs would gravitate to the more popular offenses and that we would be looking for more lightly regarded "system fits" instead. By necessity, this would lessen the recruiting on offense. Knowing that, I was expecting recruiting to tank. It didn't, but rather, stayed pretty much on par with what we came to expect from CCG. Between that and the efficiency of his O, I began to change my mind about CPJ. I just find it pretty amazing that, knowing that the system is a detriment to recruiting rankings, we still managed to stay pretty stable under CPJ.</p><p></p><p>I'd also like to make the point that finishing lower in rankings doesn't mean you are recruiting poorly. If you are finding good players that fit your system and execute it well, then what they are ranked matters not. After all, 4* Uzzi and 2* Mason both performed well in our offense, and if I had to choose one over the other, I'd pick Mason. Yet Mason was a net drain on our recruiting according to the rankings methodology.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Augusta_Jacket, post: 505507, member: 1191"] As I said, I was initially disappointed in the hire of CPJ. I was operating under the assumption that CCG would hopefully land another class like 2007 in 2009, as the 2008 class, while nice, wasn't in the same neighborhood. I assumed that premier RBs and WRs would gravitate to the more popular offenses and that we would be looking for more lightly regarded "system fits" instead. By necessity, this would lessen the recruiting on offense. Knowing that, I was expecting recruiting to tank. It didn't, but rather, stayed pretty much on par with what we came to expect from CCG. Between that and the efficiency of his O, I began to change my mind about CPJ. I just find it pretty amazing that, knowing that the system is a detriment to recruiting rankings, we still managed to stay pretty stable under CPJ. I'd also like to make the point that finishing lower in rankings doesn't mean you are recruiting poorly. If you are finding good players that fit your system and execute it well, then what they are ranked matters not. After all, 4* Uzzi and 2* Mason both performed well in our offense, and if I had to choose one over the other, I'd pick Mason. Yet Mason was a net drain on our recruiting according to the rankings methodology. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Raw Data on Recruiting
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top