Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Question about scheme
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stylee" data-source="post: 19348" data-attributes="member: 882"><p>I could be wrong, but I believe it was a 3rd and medium. Tevin took it to the house.</p><p></p><p>I'm not necessarily disagreeing that it could be a positive for us. I just think that what gets forgotten in discussions about scheme is that, when coming up with a gameplan, you're playing a game of "problem/solution." And for any given problem, there are 1000s of potential solutions. This is one bit of misdirection - but there are obviously others.</p><p></p><p>Zone Dive is, in a sense, a "misdirection" play in that you're working off of a team overplaying the triple option and flowing playside. If the DT is working hard to get into the B-Gap when he sees motion (because he knows that's where the triple option dive hits), he's going to be screwed if he gets zone blocked out into that gap and the running back cuts into the A-Gap.</p><p></p><p>To me, the real "problem" that the half-bone motion addresses is what you brought up v. VT, the cross charging outside 'backer who is timing up the snap. I think it's a great solution to that problem and would have loved to have seen it more. The solution we chose more often was the quick pitch on the triple option and the Rocket toss. Unfortunately, VT's guys were better at getting off of blocks than we were at blocking. Against UNC, they weren't and we got gains. That's football.</p><p></p><p>TL;DR; Cliffs: agree with you to a great extent.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stylee, post: 19348, member: 882"] I could be wrong, but I believe it was a 3rd and medium. Tevin took it to the house. I'm not necessarily disagreeing that it could be a positive for us. I just think that what gets forgotten in discussions about scheme is that, when coming up with a gameplan, you're playing a game of "problem/solution." And for any given problem, there are 1000s of potential solutions. This is one bit of misdirection - but there are obviously others. Zone Dive is, in a sense, a "misdirection" play in that you're working off of a team overplaying the triple option and flowing playside. If the DT is working hard to get into the B-Gap when he sees motion (because he knows that's where the triple option dive hits), he's going to be screwed if he gets zone blocked out into that gap and the running back cuts into the A-Gap. To me, the real "problem" that the half-bone motion addresses is what you brought up v. VT, the cross charging outside 'backer who is timing up the snap. I think it's a great solution to that problem and would have loved to have seen it more. The solution we chose more often was the quick pitch on the triple option and the Rocket toss. Unfortunately, VT's guys were better at getting off of blocks than we were at blocking. Against UNC, they weren't and we got gains. That's football. TL;DR; Cliffs: agree with you to a great extent. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Question about scheme
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top