Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Program Strength
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="33jacket" data-source="post: 225644" data-attributes="member: 628"><p>if my opinion isn't strong enough. Let me remind you. Of the head man's opinion. Therefore, and I have been stating it for years, I will stick with my opinion we need to change the scheme to help the OL; this in turn will help some guys at tackle, help our pass pro, and in certain cases that will filter into the run game so that our OL techniques don't show pass vs run by alignment alone. Again, I will stick by this. Now, you have every right to disagree we don't need scheme changes....ok...cool...</p><p></p><p>#1 - I didn't say we needed to overhaul our system. Hence why I use the work tweak</p><p>#2 - I readily state the scheme will primarily show up in pass sets vs run sets</p><p>#3 - Since you can't give away the play, run sets will inherit some tweaks as well</p><p></p><p>CPJ:</p><p>“My number one priority going into spring is . . . we’ve got to do a better job protecting our quarterback,” Johnson said. “[Pass protection] wasn’t very good. We’ve got to look at all of it.<strong> Look at the scheme, the way we’re teaching it, everything about it. </strong></p><p></p><p>“Like I said, it’s unfair to blame it all on the offensive line. Certainly, they have their part it in but so did the slots, the A-backs and the B-backs. <strong>It’s kind of a combination: scheme, coaching, all of it.” </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p>FYI, I will also stick by my assertion that our D will continue to struggle until Roof does some different things. What are those things? Allow the D to penetrate more before locking on the block; make the DL less LB friendly and more DL friendly. Attack the OL protection tendencies team to team more and scheme vs just call your standard playsets and blitz packages which always seem to get picked up. More complex LB to S disguise presnap. More half field zone man combos (we do none of)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="33jacket, post: 225644, member: 628"] if my opinion isn't strong enough. Let me remind you. Of the head man's opinion. Therefore, and I have been stating it for years, I will stick with my opinion we need to change the scheme to help the OL; this in turn will help some guys at tackle, help our pass pro, and in certain cases that will filter into the run game so that our OL techniques don't show pass vs run by alignment alone. Again, I will stick by this. Now, you have every right to disagree we don't need scheme changes....ok...cool... #1 - I didn't say we needed to overhaul our system. Hence why I use the work tweak #2 - I readily state the scheme will primarily show up in pass sets vs run sets #3 - Since you can't give away the play, run sets will inherit some tweaks as well CPJ: “My number one priority going into spring is . . . we’ve got to do a better job protecting our quarterback,” Johnson said. “[Pass protection] wasn’t very good. We’ve got to look at all of it.[B] Look at the scheme, the way we’re teaching it, everything about it. [/B] “Like I said, it’s unfair to blame it all on the offensive line. Certainly, they have their part it in but so did the slots, the A-backs and the B-backs. [B]It’s kind of a combination: scheme, coaching, all of it.” [/B] FYI, I will also stick by my assertion that our D will continue to struggle until Roof does some different things. What are those things? Allow the D to penetrate more before locking on the block; make the DL less LB friendly and more DL friendly. Attack the OL protection tendencies team to team more and scheme vs just call your standard playsets and blitz packages which always seem to get picked up. More complex LB to S disguise presnap. More half field zone man combos (we do none of) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Program Strength
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top