Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Official Postgame: GT 23-Duke 20
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketFan137" data-source="post: 903860" data-attributes="member: 5973"><p>the other issue is people like that one ridiculous post about wakeforest arguing that we HAVE to run a “scheme” to be competitive and that’s just incorrect. we don’t need a gimmick to close the gap and if that was what it took to close the gap every school would be trying weird things on offense. far too many “scheme” advocates think it’s a silver bullet. also the use of the word scheme has basically been bastardized into “running an offense that’s not what the big schools run”. scheme also includes stuff like kiffin’s offense, but people here that want “scheme” would not call their offense a scheme.</p><p></p><p>we need a good coach. period. whether that’s a guy with a “scheme” or not, we just need a guy that can recruit well, develop well, and get our guys to execute on gameday. scheme alone will never overcome deficits/make you an amazing team. if so paul johnson would have been undefeated against schools like duke, uva, and vt because we had equal or better talent for the most part but those weren’t always guaranteed wins.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketFan137, post: 903860, member: 5973"] the other issue is people like that one ridiculous post about wakeforest arguing that we HAVE to run a “scheme” to be competitive and that’s just incorrect. we don’t need a gimmick to close the gap and if that was what it took to close the gap every school would be trying weird things on offense. far too many “scheme” advocates think it’s a silver bullet. also the use of the word scheme has basically been bastardized into “running an offense that’s not what the big schools run”. scheme also includes stuff like kiffin’s offense, but people here that want “scheme” would not call their offense a scheme. we need a good coach. period. whether that’s a guy with a “scheme” or not, we just need a guy that can recruit well, develop well, and get our guys to execute on gameday. scheme alone will never overcome deficits/make you an amazing team. if so paul johnson would have been undefeated against schools like duke, uva, and vt because we had equal or better talent for the most part but those weren’t always guaranteed wins. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Official Postgame: GT 23-Duke 20
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top