Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Offensive Gameplan
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pointer" data-source="post: 636395" data-attributes="member: 4719"><p>Here's what I don't understand. The major goals of this staff are to</p><p>1. Run an NFL offense and defense</p><p>2. Improve recruiting</p><p></p><p>It has also been said that CDP will run different types of offense that fits the players we have.</p><p></p><p>There is also a strong following here that insists we don't have the players (or any D1 talent) on this team currently to run what we are ultimately transitioning to.</p><p></p><p>In order to run the "NFL offense" effectively, we would need to recruit at least top25 recruiting ranking classes.</p><p></p><p>This leads me to wonder how recruiting will fair with back to back aweful losing seasons. The excuse I'm hearing for the offense not working is because the O-line can't block and the quarterback can't throw. Or there aren't D1 level athletes, or they don't fit what we are trying to run.</p><p></p><p>If our coaches truly believe this and see it this way, doesn't it then make sense to run something they are good at? This will ultimately only help recruiting and make goal 2. listed above more attainable.</p><p></p><p>It doesn't make sense to me if the coaching staff believes these players can't run what they are trying to currently run, then why not do something can can run? This also contradicts CGC and CDP's strategy to run offense and defense to the strength of the players.</p><p></p><p>And before anyone blows a gasket, I'm not saying we run 3O. Just run something that this O-Line and QB's can run.</p><p></p><p>Once you get the type of players into the program that you feel can run the "NFL offense" do it then.</p><p></p><p>In the meantime, it feels like we are running something we know the team cannot, and I don't see any advantage of doing that. If all of these linemen and QB's are going to get beat out by all the great new recruits Mr. Waffle House is bringing in, then it doesn't matter what we run now. Might as well win some games this season and next, and help to pitch your recruiting better. Going 1-11 surely will not help get a top 25 class.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Btw, none of our current O-line recruitss are rated significantly higher and or have many more p5 rankings than any we have gotten with the previous coaching staff. I believe it was coach Brent Key who said something along the lines of it being way easier to recruit at Georgia Tech then at Alabama.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pointer, post: 636395, member: 4719"] Here's what I don't understand. The major goals of this staff are to 1. Run an NFL offense and defense 2. Improve recruiting It has also been said that CDP will run different types of offense that fits the players we have. There is also a strong following here that insists we don't have the players (or any D1 talent) on this team currently to run what we are ultimately transitioning to. In order to run the "NFL offense" effectively, we would need to recruit at least top25 recruiting ranking classes. This leads me to wonder how recruiting will fair with back to back aweful losing seasons. The excuse I'm hearing for the offense not working is because the O-line can't block and the quarterback can't throw. Or there aren't D1 level athletes, or they don't fit what we are trying to run. If our coaches truly believe this and see it this way, doesn't it then make sense to run something they are good at? This will ultimately only help recruiting and make goal 2. listed above more attainable. It doesn't make sense to me if the coaching staff believes these players can't run what they are trying to currently run, then why not do something can can run? This also contradicts CGC and CDP's strategy to run offense and defense to the strength of the players. And before anyone blows a gasket, I'm not saying we run 3O. Just run something that this O-Line and QB's can run. Once you get the type of players into the program that you feel can run the "NFL offense" do it then. In the meantime, it feels like we are running something we know the team cannot, and I don't see any advantage of doing that. If all of these linemen and QB's are going to get beat out by all the great new recruits Mr. Waffle House is bringing in, then it doesn't matter what we run now. Might as well win some games this season and next, and help to pitch your recruiting better. Going 1-11 surely will not help get a top 25 class. Btw, none of our current O-line recruitss are rated significantly higher and or have many more p5 rankings than any we have gotten with the previous coaching staff. I believe it was coach Brent Key who said something along the lines of it being way easier to recruit at Georgia Tech then at Alabama. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Offensive Gameplan
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top