Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Observation and Overreaction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketOff" data-source="post: 755391" data-attributes="member: 4572"><p>There’s nobody who thinks it’s acceptable to go 2-10 this year, or for 3 more years following. Everybody expected this year to be tough record wise again. But what everyone wanted was to see improvement on the field, even if it didn’t necessarily translate to wins. It’s safe to say that there is a <em>lot </em>of visible improvement. QB play, the OL, and the DL have taken the biggest steps forward, with WRs and RBs getting more talent as well. LBs/Nickel have gotten a lot of help from better DL play, and I think as a whole are better than they were last year. I think everyone can agree the secondary has regressed for one reason or another, or moved laterally at the very least.</p><p></p><p>The general consensus for the vast majority of CGC backers has been year 3 will be the year that the record really starts to shift up, and year 4 will be the year when everything is in place and we’ll see where the transformation takes us. Not winning 6 games next year will be a major disappointment, and if we don’t win 7+ in year 4 I think CGC’s seat will be extremely hot. My personal expectations are 4 wins this year, 6 next year, and 8 in year 4. I think that’s reasonably in line with other’s views. This year’s team was not supposed to have a winning record. Tech was picked to finish last in the ACC. Most writers and coaches thought Tech would only win 1 game. We’re not behind schedule, but I don’t think we’re necessarily ahead of schedule either. IMO, we’re right on time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketOff, post: 755391, member: 4572"] There’s nobody who thinks it’s acceptable to go 2-10 this year, or for 3 more years following. Everybody expected this year to be tough record wise again. But what everyone wanted was to see improvement on the field, even if it didn’t necessarily translate to wins. It’s safe to say that there is a [I]lot [/I]of visible improvement. QB play, the OL, and the DL have taken the biggest steps forward, with WRs and RBs getting more talent as well. LBs/Nickel have gotten a lot of help from better DL play, and I think as a whole are better than they were last year. I think everyone can agree the secondary has regressed for one reason or another, or moved laterally at the very least. The general consensus for the vast majority of CGC backers has been year 3 will be the year that the record really starts to shift up, and year 4 will be the year when everything is in place and we’ll see where the transformation takes us. Not winning 6 games next year will be a major disappointment, and if we don’t win 7+ in year 4 I think CGC’s seat will be extremely hot. My personal expectations are 4 wins this year, 6 next year, and 8 in year 4. I think that’s reasonably in line with other’s views. This year’s team was not supposed to have a winning record. Tech was picked to finish last in the ACC. Most writers and coaches thought Tech would only win 1 game. We’re not behind schedule, but I don’t think we’re necessarily ahead of schedule either. IMO, we’re right on time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Observation and Overreaction
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top