Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
NOAA&NASA: 2014 Warmest Year on Record
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cyptomcat" data-source="post: 127442" data-attributes="member: 323"><p>It's possible my long post was way too long, maybe I can summarize.</p><p></p><p>I have posted analysis (and tried to explain) from two scientists that are not at NASA. Both are trusted by Curry and Watts. One of the scientists is even often attacked as a skeptic.</p><p></p><p>Both of these scientists explain how your Goddard is anti-science. They do this by using the open data sets NASA has, and showing Goddard's analysis as wrong. Simply pointing differences in raw and adjusted data is not proof of any fraud as both scientists explain how it is well within the realm of regular adjustments. In addition the two scientists show other critical errors. Both Curry and Watts agree with the errors of Goddard.</p><p></p><p>I hope this helps why your statements based on Goddard's analysis is wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cyptomcat, post: 127442, member: 323"] It's possible my long post was way too long, maybe I can summarize. I have posted analysis (and tried to explain) from two scientists that are not at NASA. Both are trusted by Curry and Watts. One of the scientists is even often attacked as a skeptic. Both of these scientists explain how your Goddard is anti-science. They do this by using the open data sets NASA has, and showing Goddard's analysis as wrong. Simply pointing differences in raw and adjusted data is not proof of any fraud as both scientists explain how it is well within the realm of regular adjustments. In addition the two scientists show other critical errors. Both Curry and Watts agree with the errors of Goddard. I hope this helps why your statements based on Goddard's analysis is wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
NOAA&NASA: 2014 Warmest Year on Record
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top