Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
NIL, Transfers, and Stratospheric Salaries. What Is the Future of GT Football and College Football in General?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richard7125" data-source="post: 932502" data-attributes="member: 5703"><p>I didn’t interpret Root’s response as an attack. You offered a very creative idea and Root pointed out some big holes. Nothing is wrong with that. I like your idea about limiting team size, but I’m not a fan of penalizing teams who win (ie reducing scholarships). Something doesn’t seem right with that.</p><p></p><p>You can’t restrict what a player can make via NIL (supreme court has ruled on that). What you can do, I think, is limit NIL deals to one year. I think the big NIL dollars dry up for the kids that can’t crack the starting line-up after a year or two. Donors are not going to keep donating money to a NIL deal for kids who aren’t playing. And the reality is, if the kid isn't playing, it's highly likely that the value of his Name, Image and Likeness has been very much reduced. </p><p></p><p>I also think we should turn back the clock and make the SA sit out a year upon transferring. This should significantly reduce tampering. The SA is still free to transfer to any school they want so you are not restricting movement.</p><p></p><p>I would also implement a finite time of eligibility for any sport. You have 5 years to play 4 years of any sport - no exceptions. No redshirting, medical hardships, etc. This should reduce the rich schools (with big NIL pockets) from stockpiling talent. The SA is going to want to go somewhere to play if the clock is ticking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richard7125, post: 932502, member: 5703"] I didn’t interpret Root’s response as an attack. You offered a very creative idea and Root pointed out some big holes. Nothing is wrong with that. I like your idea about limiting team size, but I’m not a fan of penalizing teams who win (ie reducing scholarships). Something doesn’t seem right with that. You can’t restrict what a player can make via NIL (supreme court has ruled on that). What you can do, I think, is limit NIL deals to one year. I think the big NIL dollars dry up for the kids that can’t crack the starting line-up after a year or two. Donors are not going to keep donating money to a NIL deal for kids who aren’t playing. And the reality is, if the kid isn't playing, it's highly likely that the value of his Name, Image and Likeness has been very much reduced. I also think we should turn back the clock and make the SA sit out a year upon transferring. This should significantly reduce tampering. The SA is still free to transfer to any school they want so you are not restricting movement. I would also implement a finite time of eligibility for any sport. You have 5 years to play 4 years of any sport - no exceptions. No redshirting, medical hardships, etc. This should reduce the rich schools (with big NIL pockets) from stockpiling talent. The SA is going to want to go somewhere to play if the clock is ticking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
NIL, Transfers, and Stratospheric Salaries. What Is the Future of GT Football and College Football in General?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top