Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
NIL in CBB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cpf2001" data-source="post: 949507" data-attributes="member: 6459"><p>I'm not so certain even on that right now. If I'm the NCAA, I don't want to open any doors to any more legal scrutiny at all, since I'm already in potentially hot water. I don't know if they'd lose the case, and I don't think it would've been likely to get that rule overturned <strong>before</strong> they changed it, but I think once the genie is out of the bottle it could be tricky to put it back in. It would not be hard for a player to make a case that a primary reason it's come back is to limit the amount of compensation they can get. "It's interferring with the contracts the players can get from sponsors who happen to be affiliated with other teams" or some such. Any defense claims about "this rule shouldn't be invalidated just because of speculative ideas about the potential impact on their earnings" are suddenly no longer speculative and very concrete.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cpf2001, post: 949507, member: 6459"] I'm not so certain even on that right now. If I'm the NCAA, I don't want to open any doors to any more legal scrutiny at all, since I'm already in potentially hot water. I don't know if they'd lose the case, and I don't think it would've been likely to get that rule overturned [B]before[/B] they changed it, but I think once the genie is out of the bottle it could be tricky to put it back in. It would not be hard for a player to make a case that a primary reason it's come back is to limit the amount of compensation they can get. "It's interferring with the contracts the players can get from sponsors who happen to be affiliated with other teams" or some such. Any defense claims about "this rule shouldn't be invalidated just because of speculative ideas about the potential impact on their earnings" are suddenly no longer speculative and very concrete. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
NIL in CBB
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top