Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
NIL in CBB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AUFC" data-source="post: 949436" data-attributes="member: 3230"><p>I don't think the system needs many tweaks. The one piece that annoys me is tampering. I don't know if you can take away tampering but it would be nice to reward the school that gets their player tampered with similarly to how you buy the rights to a player in soccer. That really cedes a lot of power from the student-athlete to the school though, which feels wrong as long as "student" is in the name. Letting schools pay the players directly for their rights might be the move and would effectively put us on a free market pathway (which it already is in a roundabout way right now - might as well continue removing barriers). Wonder if promotion/relegation would start to come into the fold at that point.</p><p></p><p>I'm still really interested to see if top 150 players begin matriculating to mid-majors so they can average 30+mpg as freshmen. It could hamper their development but also could land them some crazy NIL deals when they hit the transfer market.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AUFC, post: 949436, member: 3230"] I don't think the system needs many tweaks. The one piece that annoys me is tampering. I don't know if you can take away tampering but it would be nice to reward the school that gets their player tampered with similarly to how you buy the rights to a player in soccer. That really cedes a lot of power from the student-athlete to the school though, which feels wrong as long as "student" is in the name. Letting schools pay the players directly for their rights might be the move and would effectively put us on a free market pathway (which it already is in a roundabout way right now - might as well continue removing barriers). Wonder if promotion/relegation would start to come into the fold at that point. I'm still really interested to see if top 150 players begin matriculating to mid-majors so they can average 30+mpg as freshmen. It could hamper their development but also could land them some crazy NIL deals when they hit the transfer market. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
NIL in CBB
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top