Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
New O scheme position changes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 514188" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>I’m not sure if this house has been beaten to death yet, but here are a few whacks.</p><p></p><p>TL;DR version: the migration shouldn’t be too drastic if we get a good OC with some sense.</p><p></p><p>The current Temple OC (Patenaude) runs an up tempo spread. It’s more balanced run vs pass than ours has been. I wouldn’t be stunned to see Patenaude come here, but I think it’s about as likely that Collins will pick someone else with an uptempo spread scheme. </p><p>Here are some highlights from the Temple / Maryland game [MEDIA=youtube]poQgnkr-Zv8[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>There’s a pick six (we’ll have to get used to those again). Some of the sets look like a half diamond formation. There’s another with a fullback. </p><p></p><p>This is enough to make me think a few of our B backs might end up in a fullback position, or maybe at linebacker. Some of our A backs might line up in a wingback role, or some in a slot. </p><p></p><p>For the most part, I think most of our players will migrate well to a somewhat new scheme. I don’t think we’re going to a traditional pro set.</p><p></p><p>Patenaude caught some flack because he started with traditional pro set players, and tried to force them into a spread offense. The players here fit his scheme better that the players he started with at Temple two years ago did, but I’d rather an OC look at what they have and try to make the most out of that, rather than think “here’s my scheme, how can I make players fit”. </p><p></p><p>I’m hoping for an OC who says “these are my playmakers, how can I get them all in a position to succeed”? I think that’s how you get great Mike Martz or LA Rams offenses. It’ll make recruiting a lot easier too, since players will see a chance to shine.</p><p></p><p>What I’m hearing are mostly “scheme” or “system” coaches lately. </p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.underdogdynasty.com/2017/7/29/15975772/temple-owls-football-offense-biggest-question-mark-entering-2017-season-american-athletic-conference" target="_blank">https://www.underdogdynasty.com/2017/7/29/15975772/temple-owls-football-offense-biggest-question-mark-entering-2017-season-american-athletic-conference</a></p><p><a href="https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelphia/temple-owls/sluggish-start-dooms-temple-was-offensive-identity-discovered" target="_blank">https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelphia/temple-owls/sluggish-start-dooms-temple-was-offensive-identity-discovered</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 514188, member: 282"] I’m not sure if this house has been beaten to death yet, but here are a few whacks. TL;DR version: the migration shouldn’t be too drastic if we get a good OC with some sense. The current Temple OC (Patenaude) runs an up tempo spread. It’s more balanced run vs pass than ours has been. I wouldn’t be stunned to see Patenaude come here, but I think it’s about as likely that Collins will pick someone else with an uptempo spread scheme. Here are some highlights from the Temple / Maryland game [MEDIA=youtube]poQgnkr-Zv8[/MEDIA] There’s a pick six (we’ll have to get used to those again). Some of the sets look like a half diamond formation. There’s another with a fullback. This is enough to make me think a few of our B backs might end up in a fullback position, or maybe at linebacker. Some of our A backs might line up in a wingback role, or some in a slot. For the most part, I think most of our players will migrate well to a somewhat new scheme. I don’t think we’re going to a traditional pro set. Patenaude caught some flack because he started with traditional pro set players, and tried to force them into a spread offense. The players here fit his scheme better that the players he started with at Temple two years ago did, but I’d rather an OC look at what they have and try to make the most out of that, rather than think “here’s my scheme, how can I make players fit”. I’m hoping for an OC who says “these are my playmakers, how can I get them all in a position to succeed”? I think that’s how you get great Mike Martz or LA Rams offenses. It’ll make recruiting a lot easier too, since players will see a chance to shine. What I’m hearing are mostly “scheme” or “system” coaches lately. [URL]https://www.underdogdynasty.com/2017/7/29/15975772/temple-owls-football-offense-biggest-question-mark-entering-2017-season-american-athletic-conference[/URL] [URL]https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelphia/temple-owls/sluggish-start-dooms-temple-was-offensive-identity-discovered[/URL] Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
New O scheme position changes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top