Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
NCAA v. Alston in the Supreme Court
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="glandon1960" data-source="post: 792914" data-attributes="member: 2458"><p>The challenge for NCAA is how do you strike a balance between allowing players to profit off their NIL - while maintaining competitive balance. </p><p>I see no way Supreme Court does not rule against the NCAA on this, but hopefully they consider the competitive advantage arguments and define some bounds.</p><p></p><p>For example - Can NCAA put a limit on what a player can make per year? Say $100K in Basketball.</p><p>Granted some schools may have trouble coming up with ways to afford even $100K/player - but - I am not worried UNC/Kentucky/Kansas/Duke in Basketball - Alabama/Ohio State/etc in football have supporters running businesses where players could make a lot more (and become a bidding war for top talent) if there are no limits.</p><p></p><p>I don't mind the players being able to make some money - but - we do need limits to preserve competitive advantage. </p><p>If they do, GT will be fine ... If they don't you will see more of a have and have not in major conferences (let alone very few teams below that level that can compete nationally with any consistency). I am not worried GT can't drum up interest in community to generate $$ for some players (think someone would want to have commercial/ads with some of our basketball players in it?).</p><p></p><p>I also agree with the post that if our current seniors can make $$$ while at GT next season, it will influence them to come back for one more run.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="glandon1960, post: 792914, member: 2458"] The challenge for NCAA is how do you strike a balance between allowing players to profit off their NIL - while maintaining competitive balance. I see no way Supreme Court does not rule against the NCAA on this, but hopefully they consider the competitive advantage arguments and define some bounds. For example - Can NCAA put a limit on what a player can make per year? Say $100K in Basketball. Granted some schools may have trouble coming up with ways to afford even $100K/player - but - I am not worried UNC/Kentucky/Kansas/Duke in Basketball - Alabama/Ohio State/etc in football have supporters running businesses where players could make a lot more (and become a bidding war for top talent) if there are no limits. I don't mind the players being able to make some money - but - we do need limits to preserve competitive advantage. If they do, GT will be fine ... If they don't you will see more of a have and have not in major conferences (let alone very few teams below that level that can compete nationally with any consistency). I am not worried GT can't drum up interest in community to generate $$ for some players (think someone would want to have commercial/ads with some of our basketball players in it?). I also agree with the post that if our current seniors can make $$$ while at GT next season, it will influence them to come back for one more run. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
NCAA v. Alston in the Supreme Court
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top