Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
National Signing Day Coverage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheTechGuy" data-source="post: 770110" data-attributes="member: 2702"><p>The talent level of the transfers correlates with the expected excitement level of the fanbase; two parts of the same argument.</p><p></p><p>The argument made by some is that the recruiting class is small and poorly ranked compared to last year’s class, but we should still be excited about the transfers. My point was that Cochran and White seem to be immediate impact players, but the rest will require additional time before they <em>may</em> make an exceptional impact.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately, we missed on guys that it would have been nice to sign. I’m skeptical that signing Pendley, Harris, Scott, and Watson make up for those misses long term.</p><p></p><p>Regarding Griffin, you continue to make my point. He played behind Gibbs this year, who is a freshman. Unlike Gibbs, Griffin didn’t make an immediate impact as a freshman. If Griffin transfers - I hope he doesn’t - fans at the school he transfers to would be skeptical that he would make an exceptional impact. Similar to my skepticism of the aforementioned transfers we signed, notwithstanding Cochran and White who saw significant playing time at their prior schools.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheTechGuy, post: 770110, member: 2702"] The talent level of the transfers correlates with the expected excitement level of the fanbase; two parts of the same argument. The argument made by some is that the recruiting class is small and poorly ranked compared to last year’s class, but we should still be excited about the transfers. My point was that Cochran and White seem to be immediate impact players, but the rest will require additional time before they [I]may[/I] make an exceptional impact. Ultimately, we missed on guys that it would have been nice to sign. I’m skeptical that signing Pendley, Harris, Scott, and Watson make up for those misses long term. Regarding Griffin, you continue to make my point. He played behind Gibbs this year, who is a freshman. Unlike Gibbs, Griffin didn’t make an immediate impact as a freshman. If Griffin transfers - I hope he doesn’t - fans at the school he transfers to would be skeptical that he would make an exceptional impact. Similar to my skepticism of the aforementioned transfers we signed, notwithstanding Cochran and White who saw significant playing time at their prior schools. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
National Signing Day Coverage
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top