Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
National Signing Day Coverage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 769869" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>You limited your sample group to exclude major parts of the conversation that has been happening and then used your limited sample group to draw a conclusion that the conversations that are happening now are the same as ever. The only reason to do that is because you had a conclusion that you wanted to reach and chose to only look at the parts that supported that conclusion. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's not a pattern. Every defense of a recruiting class will center around the notion that the recruiting rankings are wrong because if that point isn't a part of the argument then you've accepted that the class is the quality that the only real metric that is used to evaluate it is correct. That's like saying there is a pattern in explaining why our offense struggles now and when it struggled under Johnson because they are both about not being able to score enough points. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So what other purpose is there to ignore major parts of the arguments going on or key characteristics of an argument if not to reach a certain conclusion that just happens to be comparing previous classes to the current one, excuse me defenses of previous classes to the defenses of the current one?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 769869, member: 2299"] You limited your sample group to exclude major parts of the conversation that has been happening and then used your limited sample group to draw a conclusion that the conversations that are happening now are the same as ever. The only reason to do that is because you had a conclusion that you wanted to reach and chose to only look at the parts that supported that conclusion. That's not a pattern. Every defense of a recruiting class will center around the notion that the recruiting rankings are wrong because if that point isn't a part of the argument then you've accepted that the class is the quality that the only real metric that is used to evaluate it is correct. That's like saying there is a pattern in explaining why our offense struggles now and when it struggled under Johnson because they are both about not being able to score enough points. So what other purpose is there to ignore major parts of the arguments going on or key characteristics of an argument if not to reach a certain conclusion that just happens to be comparing previous classes to the current one, excuse me defenses of previous classes to the defenses of the current one? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
National Signing Day Coverage
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top