Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
National Signing Day Coverage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Northeast Stinger" data-source="post: 769864" data-attributes="member: 1640"><p>1. Your first point is valid, in as much as this was the argument YOU were making and I did not address arguments that were unique. To repeat, I was talking about arguments that were the SAME. If you have a unique argument then you are clearly outside the sample group and not who I was talking about. I have said this repeatedly.</p><p></p><p>2. Yes, covid in and of itself is a unique argument, no question about it. Suggesting that ratings service, don’t get it right in a given year, for this reason or that reason, is as old as the hills. Please note, I never once suggested that a rating service getting it wrong in a given year is an invalid argument. It may be valid, it may not be, but THE PATTERN is the SAME. If people argue in a given year that recruiting service’s didn’t get it right and a class ranking is artificially high or low as a result, that is a pretty standard argument. </p><p></p><p>3. This is a total mischaracterization as I have stated repeatedly. Demonstrating how other people attack or defend class rankings year after year has nothing to do with what I think about the quality of the class. I actually have NO OPINION about this recruiting class. I hope it’s a good one but I am not going to live or die on what number you or anyone else thinks it should or should not get.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Northeast Stinger, post: 769864, member: 1640"] 1. Your first point is valid, in as much as this was the argument YOU were making and I did not address arguments that were unique. To repeat, I was talking about arguments that were the SAME. If you have a unique argument then you are clearly outside the sample group and not who I was talking about. I have said this repeatedly. 2. Yes, covid in and of itself is a unique argument, no question about it. Suggesting that ratings service, don’t get it right in a given year, for this reason or that reason, is as old as the hills. Please note, I never once suggested that a rating service getting it wrong in a given year is an invalid argument. It may be valid, it may not be, but THE PATTERN is the SAME. If people argue in a given year that recruiting service’s didn’t get it right and a class ranking is artificially high or low as a result, that is a pretty standard argument. 3. This is a total mischaracterization as I have stated repeatedly. Demonstrating how other people attack or defend class rankings year after year has nothing to do with what I think about the quality of the class. I actually have NO OPINION about this recruiting class. I hope it’s a good one but I am not going to live or die on what number you or anyone else thinks it should or should not get. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
National Signing Day Coverage
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top