Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
National Signing Day Coverage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takethepoints" data-source="post: 769773" data-attributes="member: 265"><p>1. Yes. I can understand why this is done; it levels the ranking to a single standard and, after all, the rankings for transfers are for high school, not their play in college. Still, it does affect the "class" rankings. Provided, that is, that you actually think those are anything close to accurate in the first place.</p><p></p><p>2. Well … no, we can't. Like I just said, the "rankings" are for play in high school, not in college. And you need to remember that, with some exceptions, players transfer because they <em>can't see the field</em> at their first choice. In some cases, that's no disgrace: Bammer and Texas have really good programs and they may have been buried in their positions or run afoul of the coaches. But a really good high school rating is no guarantee that you will be a really good college player. The only way to find out is to re-rank classes four years in based on how well their teams are doing. We'll have to see about that.</p><p></p><p>3. Some arguments are (you just made one); most of them aren't. The Stinger is right. But none of them matter. What matters is what the players do on the field. And, again, we'll have to see about that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takethepoints, post: 769773, member: 265"] 1. Yes. I can understand why this is done; it levels the ranking to a single standard and, after all, the rankings for transfers are for high school, not their play in college. Still, it does affect the "class" rankings. Provided, that is, that you actually think those are anything close to accurate in the first place. 2. Well … no, we can't. Like I just said, the "rankings" are for play in high school, not in college. And you need to remember that, with some exceptions, players transfer because they [I]can't see the field[/I] at their first choice. In some cases, that's no disgrace: Bammer and Texas have really good programs and they may have been buried in their positions or run afoul of the coaches. But a really good high school rating is no guarantee that you will be a really good college player. The only way to find out is to re-rank classes four years in based on how well their teams are doing. We'll have to see about that. 3. Some arguments are (you just made one); most of them aren't. The Stinger is right. But none of them matter. What matters is what the players do on the field. And, again, we'll have to see about that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
National Signing Day Coverage
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top