Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
National Signing Day Coverage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CuseJacket" data-source="post: 768993" data-attributes="member: 274"><p>I hope you will engage on this, because it is a point people have made many times and takes the average stars concept but makes it better and more specific.</p><p></p><p>Average stars is an ok proxy but not the best, especially when you have a 5.7 3* vs 5.5 3* (Rivals). On average, there is a big difference in offer lists and upside potential between the two.</p><p></p><p>But if you want to go with average stars, 2021 outshines 2013:</p><p>2021: Based on average stars we finished 6th in the ACC (3.0 on Rivals) and 8th in the ACC (86.13 on 247).</p><p>2013: Based on average stars we finished 10th in the ACC (2.71 on Rivals) and 9th in the ACC (83.56 on 247)</p><p></p><p>And the analysis of these classes ignores the talent infusion we got via transfers this year. It ignores the fact that one of our recruiting advantages, allegedly, is the direct in-person interactions with the coaches, which was rendered moot this year. And ignores that in 2013, per Rivals, only 7 of the 14 recruits were rated 5.6 or higher. Whereas in 2021, 13 of the 16 recruits are 5.6 or higher.</p><p></p><p>I also believe volume should matter in overall ranking, but I hope you do not focus on this, as the basis of my post is in response to how avg. stars is fairly shallow in and of itself when there is better data available.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CuseJacket, post: 768993, member: 274"] I hope you will engage on this, because it is a point people have made many times and takes the average stars concept but makes it better and more specific. Average stars is an ok proxy but not the best, especially when you have a 5.7 3* vs 5.5 3* (Rivals). On average, there is a big difference in offer lists and upside potential between the two. But if you want to go with average stars, 2021 outshines 2013: 2021: Based on average stars we finished 6th in the ACC (3.0 on Rivals) and 8th in the ACC (86.13 on 247). 2013: Based on average stars we finished 10th in the ACC (2.71 on Rivals) and 9th in the ACC (83.56 on 247) And the analysis of these classes ignores the talent infusion we got via transfers this year. It ignores the fact that one of our recruiting advantages, allegedly, is the direct in-person interactions with the coaches, which was rendered moot this year. And ignores that in 2013, per Rivals, only 7 of the 14 recruits were rated 5.6 or higher. Whereas in 2021, 13 of the 16 recruits are 5.6 or higher. I also believe volume should matter in overall ranking, but I hope you do not focus on this, as the basis of my post is in response to how avg. stars is fairly shallow in and of itself when there is better data available. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
National Signing Day Coverage
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top