Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Name and Likeness Law Signed by Kemp
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Northeast Stinger" data-source="post: 807017" data-attributes="member: 1640"><p>Sure there is. The history of college football has always been about trying to “equalize” going back to making it illegal to have non-student ringers on the team. It’s just time once again to tweak an unfair advantage for the sake of “amateurism and higher education” as the Supreme Court put it.</p><p></p><p>Recruiting services and coaches would no longer have as much incentive to game the star rankings because every school and every coach would get their fair shot at top athletes. The winning margin would no longer be built around stockpiling but around who could do a better job recruiting and developing 3 star athletes, the vast majority of athletes who often get short-changed.</p><p></p><p>When I first offered this concept I was just spit-balling for discussion sake but the more I have heard the counter arguments the more I’ve come around to thinking this might be a really good idea.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Northeast Stinger, post: 807017, member: 1640"] Sure there is. The history of college football has always been about trying to “equalize” going back to making it illegal to have non-student ringers on the team. It’s just time once again to tweak an unfair advantage for the sake of “amateurism and higher education” as the Supreme Court put it. Recruiting services and coaches would no longer have as much incentive to game the star rankings because every school and every coach would get their fair shot at top athletes. The winning margin would no longer be built around stockpiling but around who could do a better job recruiting and developing 3 star athletes, the vast majority of athletes who often get short-changed. When I first offered this concept I was just spit-balling for discussion sake but the more I have heard the counter arguments the more I’ve come around to thinking this might be a really good idea. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Name and Likeness Law Signed by Kemp
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top