Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Mostly “Fire Geoff Collins”, some reminiscing, maybe bourbon or other distractions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketOff" data-source="post: 857417" data-attributes="member: 4572"><p>You’ve been really into the STEM qualifier lately. Fact is it really doesn’t matter who is a STEM school and who isn’t. It’s been proven that Tech can recruit at the top 25 level regardless of the fact that we are a STEM school. Do you really think Utah, Iowa State, or Wake Forest have higher recruiting ceilings simply because they aren’t STEM schools? The fact is that you don’t need to be “different” to be successful. </p><p></p><p>What you <em>do </em>need is a team of players willing to buy into whatever system is in place and play for each other, <em>and </em>you need to be able to put together complete games in all 3 phases. It also helps when your offensive and defensive play styles complement each other. </p><p></p><p>A good coach will implement a system that includes all of those things, and will compete with and beat many teams with greater talent but worse preparation and team play. Cutcliffe wasn’t doing anything crazy or different on either side of the ball and he ran out some pretty good Duke teams with some severe talent deficiencies. It also helps when you have a fully developed QB playing for you. See Duke with Daniel Jones, Pitt with Kenny Pickett, Wake with Hartman, Iowa State with Purdy, Ole Miss with Corral, Cincinnati with Ridder, BYU with Zach Wilson, and so on and so forth</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketOff, post: 857417, member: 4572"] You’ve been really into the STEM qualifier lately. Fact is it really doesn’t matter who is a STEM school and who isn’t. It’s been proven that Tech can recruit at the top 25 level regardless of the fact that we are a STEM school. Do you really think Utah, Iowa State, or Wake Forest have higher recruiting ceilings simply because they aren’t STEM schools? The fact is that you don’t need to be “different” to be successful. What you [I]do [/I]need is a team of players willing to buy into whatever system is in place and play for each other, [I]and [/I]you need to be able to put together complete games in all 3 phases. It also helps when your offensive and defensive play styles complement each other. A good coach will implement a system that includes all of those things, and will compete with and beat many teams with greater talent but worse preparation and team play. Cutcliffe wasn’t doing anything crazy or different on either side of the ball and he ran out some pretty good Duke teams with some severe talent deficiencies. It also helps when you have a fully developed QB playing for you. See Duke with Daniel Jones, Pitt with Kenny Pickett, Wake with Hartman, Iowa State with Purdy, Ole Miss with Corral, Cincinnati with Ridder, BYU with Zach Wilson, and so on and so forth [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Mostly “Fire Geoff Collins”, some reminiscing, maybe bourbon or other distractions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top