Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Men's Basketball: Lamar Cardinals Preview
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RamblinRed" data-source="post: 483838" data-attributes="member: 1776"><p>As far as Moses and Cole, I don't think it is a huge thing to say Cole is ahead of Moses right now.</p><p></p><p>Cole went 0-3 from 3 in one game, but has shown to be a better shooter over the course of a full year and frankly his shot just looks better than Moses'.</p><p>Cole also simply has more offensive game in general and looks more comfortable at that end of the court especially in halfcourt situations. </p><p></p><p>Cole also is more willing to go inside and mix it up and especially rebound (Cole had 10 in 16 min on Saturday, Moses had 1 in 18 min). Cole is also the better ball handler. </p><p>Wright is more dangerous in transition situations.</p><p></p><p>But the fact that Cole is starting likely means the staff sees him as the better or more important player at this point. </p><p>Moses should see plenty of time this year (and I hope he would as his upside is huge). On the offensive end Moses doesn't look all that comfortable going inside, he tends to want to hang out on the perimeter. Wasp, if Cole developed into a poor man's Hansborough I would be very happy. </p><p></p><p>I think Alston is going to have a hard time getting min once Devoe is back. Eventually Devoe is going to start. I think Shembari and Curtis are most likely to play after that and then Alston behind them. If Moore limits his mistakes quickly he could pass him as well. Alston almost feels like do you play him over Curtis. Not sure i would. For the long term of the program it seems to make more sense to give the minutes to Curtis and let him develop.</p><p></p><p>In general this year feels like a big transition year. Let these FR and SO take their lumps and gain experience. You lose Alston - who should be pretty easily replaceable and AD - who is a little tougher but feel like we will at least be even with Banks coming in.</p><p>Banks should be better than AD from day 1, but AD has developed a nice offensive game. I'm interested to see what Banks looks like offensively after working with Reveno for a year or more. </p><p></p><p>I thought both Sjolund and Moore flashed some nice long term potential. </p><p></p><p>With no Lammers the offense will obviously be in flux this year probably see alot more of what it should look like in the future. </p><p>Hopefully this is the last year to just sort of get through things as best we can and then we take a significant upswing next season.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RamblinRed, post: 483838, member: 1776"] As far as Moses and Cole, I don't think it is a huge thing to say Cole is ahead of Moses right now. Cole went 0-3 from 3 in one game, but has shown to be a better shooter over the course of a full year and frankly his shot just looks better than Moses'. Cole also simply has more offensive game in general and looks more comfortable at that end of the court especially in halfcourt situations. Cole also is more willing to go inside and mix it up and especially rebound (Cole had 10 in 16 min on Saturday, Moses had 1 in 18 min). Cole is also the better ball handler. Wright is more dangerous in transition situations. But the fact that Cole is starting likely means the staff sees him as the better or more important player at this point. Moses should see plenty of time this year (and I hope he would as his upside is huge). On the offensive end Moses doesn't look all that comfortable going inside, he tends to want to hang out on the perimeter. Wasp, if Cole developed into a poor man's Hansborough I would be very happy. I think Alston is going to have a hard time getting min once Devoe is back. Eventually Devoe is going to start. I think Shembari and Curtis are most likely to play after that and then Alston behind them. If Moore limits his mistakes quickly he could pass him as well. Alston almost feels like do you play him over Curtis. Not sure i would. For the long term of the program it seems to make more sense to give the minutes to Curtis and let him develop. In general this year feels like a big transition year. Let these FR and SO take their lumps and gain experience. You lose Alston - who should be pretty easily replaceable and AD - who is a little tougher but feel like we will at least be even with Banks coming in. Banks should be better than AD from day 1, but AD has developed a nice offensive game. I'm interested to see what Banks looks like offensively after working with Reveno for a year or more. I thought both Sjolund and Moore flashed some nice long term potential. With no Lammers the offense will obviously be in flux this year probably see alot more of what it should look like in the future. Hopefully this is the last year to just sort of get through things as best we can and then we take a significant upswing next season. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Men's Basketball: Lamar Cardinals Preview
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top