Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Louisville (-5) vs Georgia Tech
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="boger2337" data-source="post: 750469" data-attributes="member: 4089"><p>Looking at this game in more detail I would say the under is a pretty solid bet. 64 is the number</p><p></p><p>64 is high.</p><p></p><p> Mostly due to a UCF team that would score 30 on most teams not in the top 10 in football. </p><p>AND a bad showing against a Cuse team that was desperate, playing at home, and they had a weird screwy fake covid scare pregame to mess up our mojo. </p><p></p><p>Louisville's offense hasn't been stellar so far this year, and most would bet they find their rhythm against us. I beg to differ. We will now return some defensive help minus Swilling, have both TEs back, and hopefully Clayton is up to speed after a sleepy first start in Syracuse. Louisville is probably good for 24 points. </p><p></p><p>Now for GT.... Can we not turn the ball over? Or will we find new ways to give the defense the ball? I think we come down from 4-5 turnovers, but still give the ball away 2-3 times. My bet is on 2 turnovers, with us getting 2 ourselves. This makes for a mostly even playing field. I think with 2 or less turnovers we can put up 27-30 points. </p><p></p><p>As you can see where I am going with this... Both teams putting up extremely respectful points say 27 and 24. This still falls 2 TDs short of the over. Barring some garbage time TD one way or the other, this game should fall in the 50s. </p><p></p><p>This is about the only way I would play this game, other than teasing the under and GT 6 points which would give me under 70 and GT +11. </p><p></p><p>[USER=1123]@RyanS12[/USER] thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="boger2337, post: 750469, member: 4089"] Looking at this game in more detail I would say the under is a pretty solid bet. 64 is the number 64 is high. Mostly due to a UCF team that would score 30 on most teams not in the top 10 in football. AND a bad showing against a Cuse team that was desperate, playing at home, and they had a weird screwy fake covid scare pregame to mess up our mojo. Louisville's offense hasn't been stellar so far this year, and most would bet they find their rhythm against us. I beg to differ. We will now return some defensive help minus Swilling, have both TEs back, and hopefully Clayton is up to speed after a sleepy first start in Syracuse. Louisville is probably good for 24 points. Now for GT.... Can we not turn the ball over? Or will we find new ways to give the defense the ball? I think we come down from 4-5 turnovers, but still give the ball away 2-3 times. My bet is on 2 turnovers, with us getting 2 ourselves. This makes for a mostly even playing field. I think with 2 or less turnovers we can put up 27-30 points. As you can see where I am going with this... Both teams putting up extremely respectful points say 27 and 24. This still falls 2 TDs short of the over. Barring some garbage time TD one way or the other, this game should fall in the 50s. This is about the only way I would play this game, other than teasing the under and GT 6 points which would give me under 70 and GT +11. [USER=1123]@RyanS12[/USER] thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Louisville (-5) vs Georgia Tech
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top