Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Just a reminder!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 209868" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>No, it means I claim to know something about Bible scholarship. If you actually read the post you are quoting from here, I acknowledged my limitations on climate science and why coming to a dogmatic conclusion is difficult. I then cited the data I use for being more skeptical of one side than the other. In my opinion, that's what it looks like when you hold a position that is not based on faith, you are able to lay out the data that you rely on. In this case I used data which I believe came from the experts who claimed a certain position for being skeptical of their position. I wasn't just citing the data coming from the opposing experts. </p><p></p><p>So, either your post reflects an extreme failure in logic or it was intended as an ad hominem personal attack on me. If the latter, I wonder what I have said to warrant such an attack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 209868, member: 195"] No, it means I claim to know something about Bible scholarship. If you actually read the post you are quoting from here, I acknowledged my limitations on climate science and why coming to a dogmatic conclusion is difficult. I then cited the data I use for being more skeptical of one side than the other. In my opinion, that's what it looks like when you hold a position that is not based on faith, you are able to lay out the data that you rely on. In this case I used data which I believe came from the experts who claimed a certain position for being skeptical of their position. I wasn't just citing the data coming from the opposing experts. So, either your post reflects an extreme failure in logic or it was intended as an ad hominem personal attack on me. If the latter, I wonder what I have said to warrant such an attack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Just a reminder!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top