Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
James Graham Transferring
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 761966" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>Rivals only counts the top 20 recruits, so signing 3 more won't change things that much unless those three bump the bottom ranked recruits out of the calculation and improve the average.</p><p></p><p>I don't think looking at recruiting site rankings is extremely useful at all. Like you indicate at this point it is even less useful. I consider the player rankings to be suspect at best. This year, the recruiting sites haven't even been able to evaluate the players to arrive at (suspect) rankings, so the rankings are even less accurate. </p><p></p><p>I think your analysis is somewhat rosy. Sure, we could rise a few places if we sign a few highly regarded recruits. However, look at the teams below us also. FSU only has 15 commits. If they sign 2 or 3 just at the average of GT's recruits, they would pass GT. Of all the teams ranked below GT, I think only BC is in a position that would make it virtually impossible for them to pass GT. Duke most likely won't, but they have 9 spots available. If they were to sign 3 or 4 4* guys, they probably would pass GT.</p><p></p><p>Back to your point about having to wait until the end, with where things are now, GT could end up anywhere from #4 to #13 in the rankings come February. Just a total guess, I would guess that it will be somewhere between 6 and 9. However, it is very possible to be a little higher or a little lower than my guess.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 761966, member: 2426"] Rivals only counts the top 20 recruits, so signing 3 more won't change things that much unless those three bump the bottom ranked recruits out of the calculation and improve the average. I don't think looking at recruiting site rankings is extremely useful at all. Like you indicate at this point it is even less useful. I consider the player rankings to be suspect at best. This year, the recruiting sites haven't even been able to evaluate the players to arrive at (suspect) rankings, so the rankings are even less accurate. I think your analysis is somewhat rosy. Sure, we could rise a few places if we sign a few highly regarded recruits. However, look at the teams below us also. FSU only has 15 commits. If they sign 2 or 3 just at the average of GT's recruits, they would pass GT. Of all the teams ranked below GT, I think only BC is in a position that would make it virtually impossible for them to pass GT. Duke most likely won't, but they have 9 spots available. If they were to sign 3 or 4 4* guys, they probably would pass GT. Back to your point about having to wait until the end, with where things are now, GT could end up anywhere from #4 to #13 in the rankings come February. Just a total guess, I would guess that it will be somewhere between 6 and 9. However, it is very possible to be a little higher or a little lower than my guess. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
James Graham Transferring
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top