Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Jackets Brought the Juice to Tallahassee
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BainbridgeJacket" data-source="post: 743023" data-attributes="member: 376"><p>QB- huge improvement from last year, even with the stupid mistakes. Looks like a top half ACC QB with a skill set that gives him a really high ceiling. Will need to take a huge leap before UCF if we want to win. </p><p>RB- so much talent here, glad we leaned on them in the second half</p><p>WR- the routes are so so so much better than last year. These guys always had the physical tools, wow what an improvement. Was A. Brown playing dinged up? Seemed to limp a couple times after the play. </p><p>TE- caught a couple passes, made some blocks. Utilized better than last year, but have to avoid big penalties. </p><p>OL- miles ahead of last year. Held up really well against what should be one of the toughest lines we play this year (I hate making these kinds of statements so early in the season, we'll see if that's true). I'm hoping to see more improvement, especially run blocking which was nonexistent in the first half. </p><p>DL- rough first half, but were able to make hay in the second when it became our second string vs theirs. Ryans is game ball imo.</p><p>LB- ugh. Maybe I'm just spoiled because I was at Tech 2005-2009, but I really cannot wait for this position group to live up to my expectations</p><p>CB/NB- I thought they played a really good game and contested most passes</p><p>S- I was disappointed, I thought they were a couple steps slow on most plays</p><p>ST- if there's one area where it's obvious the split practices hurt us, this is it. Holy cow that was bad.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BainbridgeJacket, post: 743023, member: 376"] QB- huge improvement from last year, even with the stupid mistakes. Looks like a top half ACC QB with a skill set that gives him a really high ceiling. Will need to take a huge leap before UCF if we want to win. RB- so much talent here, glad we leaned on them in the second half WR- the routes are so so so much better than last year. These guys always had the physical tools, wow what an improvement. Was A. Brown playing dinged up? Seemed to limp a couple times after the play. TE- caught a couple passes, made some blocks. Utilized better than last year, but have to avoid big penalties. OL- miles ahead of last year. Held up really well against what should be one of the toughest lines we play this year (I hate making these kinds of statements so early in the season, we'll see if that's true). I'm hoping to see more improvement, especially run blocking which was nonexistent in the first half. DL- rough first half, but were able to make hay in the second when it became our second string vs theirs. Ryans is game ball imo. LB- ugh. Maybe I'm just spoiled because I was at Tech 2005-2009, but I really cannot wait for this position group to live up to my expectations CB/NB- I thought they played a really good game and contested most passes S- I was disappointed, I thought they were a couple steps slow on most plays ST- if there's one area where it's obvious the split practices hurt us, this is it. Holy cow that was bad. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Jackets Brought the Juice to Tallahassee
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top