Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Is there "another level" of football?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 495047" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>I compared Expenses vs F+. The numbers are weird because the private schools apparently give whatever kind of numbers they want to. Notre Dame claims $13 Million in Revenues and $12 Million in expenses, which is at least a venal sin to lie like that. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]4571[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>We're in the middle in results and spending. I suspect a lot of the data points below $50 million are schools giving bogus financial info to the NCAA because they can. If you're farther to the right, you're going to win a lot more. </p><p></p><p>The bottom right dot is Notre Dame. If they're only spending $12M across all their sports, {insert "I'm the Pope" or something silly here} </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, FEI and S&P+ (which F+ combines) both do a decent job forecasting how likely you are to win a game. I think S&P+ forecast us at 6 wins before the season. It's arguable that Wells was heavily responsible for that one game swing as a walk on kicker. </p><p></p><p>I think you'd see either clumping in the data if it was a bad model (I'm surprised not to see a lot more just from randomness), or the predictions would be lousy. The predictions are pretty good. </p><p></p><p> (FWIW, I used last week's ratings, and we're down about 10 places in the rankings since Saturday).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 495047, member: 282"] I compared Expenses vs F+. The numbers are weird because the private schools apparently give whatever kind of numbers they want to. Notre Dame claims $13 Million in Revenues and $12 Million in expenses, which is at least a venal sin to lie like that. [ATTACH=full]4571[/ATTACH] We're in the middle in results and spending. I suspect a lot of the data points below $50 million are schools giving bogus financial info to the NCAA because they can. If you're farther to the right, you're going to win a lot more. The bottom right dot is Notre Dame. If they're only spending $12M across all their sports, {insert "I'm the Pope" or something silly here} Well, FEI and S&P+ (which F+ combines) both do a decent job forecasting how likely you are to win a game. I think S&P+ forecast us at 6 wins before the season. It's arguable that Wells was heavily responsible for that one game swing as a walk on kicker. I think you'd see either clumping in the data if it was a bad model (I'm surprised not to see a lot more just from randomness), or the predictions would be lousy. The predictions are pretty good. (FWIW, I used last week's ratings, and we're down about 10 places in the rankings since Saturday). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Is there "another level" of football?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top