Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Is Collins nasty enough to be a HC ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Techster" data-source="post: 749787" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>If you build up a program to a certain point, support it and the coaches you bring in, then you can attract good coaches that want to stay.</p><p></p><p>Stanford and Duke are good examples. Harbaugh came in, recruited well, and built up Stanford to win consistently. Now Brian Shaw is maintaining a good program there, and he's been on many factory schools AD's lists and NFL lists over years but chooses to remain at Stanford because they maintained a program that Shaw finds attractive to put roots down.</p><p></p><p>Say what you want about David Cutcliffe, but he has raised the level of play for Duke. Duke has rewarded him and supported him enough that he's turned down several jobs over the year...he turned down Tennessee multiple times and that fanbase worships him for what he did with Peyton Manning, Tee Martin, and Heath Shuler. </p><p></p><p>Point is, GT can be one of those places. In this era, if a coach stays 8-10 years, that's considered a long time. If you look at what Stansbury is doing, he's putting things in place to attract good coaches and giving them reasons to stay. Giving CGC 7 years and all that money, and all the social media support isn't just helping CGC...it's also advertising for the next coach that GT is upping the game and doing what we need to do to bring in and support good coaches.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Techster, post: 749787, member: 360"] If you build up a program to a certain point, support it and the coaches you bring in, then you can attract good coaches that want to stay. Stanford and Duke are good examples. Harbaugh came in, recruited well, and built up Stanford to win consistently. Now Brian Shaw is maintaining a good program there, and he's been on many factory schools AD's lists and NFL lists over years but chooses to remain at Stanford because they maintained a program that Shaw finds attractive to put roots down. Say what you want about David Cutcliffe, but he has raised the level of play for Duke. Duke has rewarded him and supported him enough that he's turned down several jobs over the year...he turned down Tennessee multiple times and that fanbase worships him for what he did with Peyton Manning, Tee Martin, and Heath Shuler. Point is, GT can be one of those places. In this era, if a coach stays 8-10 years, that's considered a long time. If you look at what Stansbury is doing, he's putting things in place to attract good coaches and giving them reasons to stay. Giving CGC 7 years and all that money, and all the social media support isn't just helping CGC...it's also advertising for the next coach that GT is upping the game and doing what we need to do to bring in and support good coaches. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Is Collins nasty enough to be a HC ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top