Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Is college football near the end as we know it.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BonafideJacket" data-source="post: 638690" data-attributes="member: 1011"><p>There are a lot of reasons to care, even for those of us who support the idea in theory. There's a lot to work through.</p><p></p><p>Who determines what is a legitimate vs fraudulent contract for NIL? Hopefully not the NCAA. Bigger question is do we care?</p><p></p><p>How does this work with agreements the schools have? What happens when a RB endorsed by Nike refuses to take the field in an Adidas jersey? Or perhaps more importantly, how much influence will the shoe companies gain beyond what they already have in recruiting?</p><p></p><p>What about non-competes? Can I pay a monster middle linebacker to hawk my cleaning products but only if he agrees not to transfer to UGA in the next three years?</p><p></p><p>What about players who leave early or flunk out or transfer? Does the donor/booster have recourse for failure to fulfill the contract?</p><p></p><p>Will there be a place for incentives-based contracts? Will that implicate gambling laws? Will players have standing to sue for tortuous interference with a contract if a coach doesn't play them for arbitrary reasons?</p><p></p><p>You could adopt the pro leagues' stance on a lot of these issues, but is that really the best approach?</p><p></p><p>Michael McCann at SI is putting out some great stuff on this topic for those interested: <a href="https://www.si.com/college-football/2019/09/30/fair-pay-to-play-act-law-ncaa-california-pac-12" target="_blank">https://www.si.com/college-football/2019/09/30/fair-pay-to-play-act-law-ncaa-california-pac-12</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BonafideJacket, post: 638690, member: 1011"] There are a lot of reasons to care, even for those of us who support the idea in theory. There's a lot to work through. Who determines what is a legitimate vs fraudulent contract for NIL? Hopefully not the NCAA. Bigger question is do we care? How does this work with agreements the schools have? What happens when a RB endorsed by Nike refuses to take the field in an Adidas jersey? Or perhaps more importantly, how much influence will the shoe companies gain beyond what they already have in recruiting? What about non-competes? Can I pay a monster middle linebacker to hawk my cleaning products but only if he agrees not to transfer to UGA in the next three years? What about players who leave early or flunk out or transfer? Does the donor/booster have recourse for failure to fulfill the contract? Will there be a place for incentives-based contracts? Will that implicate gambling laws? Will players have standing to sue for tortuous interference with a contract if a coach doesn't play them for arbitrary reasons? You could adopt the pro leagues' stance on a lot of these issues, but is that really the best approach? Michael McCann at SI is putting out some great stuff on this topic for those interested: [URL]https://www.si.com/college-football/2019/09/30/fair-pay-to-play-act-law-ncaa-california-pac-12[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Is college football near the end as we know it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top