Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Is college football near the end as we know it.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BonafideJacket" data-source="post: 638677" data-attributes="member: 1011"><p>There are some legitimate constitutional questions regarding the commerce clause at play, but those are limited to the relationship between the school, conference, and the NCAA. I'm all for an individual profiting from their own likeness whenever and however they want. However, I do think there will be unintended consequences for non-revenue sports, facilities, and other cost centers for athletic departments. Some portion of the current legitimate donations being funneled through athletic departments will instead now be given directly to the player. The big winner here (besides the 1% of football and basketball players who will actually profit) is the government. Former donations now paid to players will not longer be tax deductible, and the recipient will be responsible for income tax (recruiting advantages for Texas and Florida schools as they have no income tax).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BonafideJacket, post: 638677, member: 1011"] There are some legitimate constitutional questions regarding the commerce clause at play, but those are limited to the relationship between the school, conference, and the NCAA. I'm all for an individual profiting from their own likeness whenever and however they want. However, I do think there will be unintended consequences for non-revenue sports, facilities, and other cost centers for athletic departments. Some portion of the current legitimate donations being funneled through athletic departments will instead now be given directly to the player. The big winner here (besides the 1% of football and basketball players who will actually profit) is the government. Former donations now paid to players will not longer be tax deductible, and the recipient will be responsible for income tax (recruiting advantages for Texas and Florida schools as they have no income tax). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Is college football near the end as we know it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top