Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Interesting stat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alagold" data-source="post: 402520" data-attributes="member: 58"><p>I was curious about what has been the % of recruits lost at Tech in the classes '13 -'16.(too early for 17/18) What do you think is a typical number? </p><p>After looking back at who was not here to play the 4 yrs for whatever reason (academics, kicked off, lost interest , dislike coach(es) , etc,and injured, which were very few--the numbers seem to be 56,29,31,28. </p><p></p><p>For a team that doesn't usually have 85 on scholly all the time ,that seems a large number.Also, these were not chumps .There was some real talent going out the door.</p><p></p><p>btw-Just for fun, I went back to compare an opponents number.I picked dook '14 because they didn't have coaching change. From that signed class of 18 ,dook had 15 still playing 4 yrs later.That's less than 17% compared to our 29 .A bunch of upperclass talent was there.--maybe a connection to why they beat us -easily.Anybody is welcome to check others. Would be interesting to see them.</p><p></p><p>So getting the good recruits is tough, keeping them is tougher possibly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alagold, post: 402520, member: 58"] I was curious about what has been the % of recruits lost at Tech in the classes '13 -'16.(too early for 17/18) What do you think is a typical number? After looking back at who was not here to play the 4 yrs for whatever reason (academics, kicked off, lost interest , dislike coach(es) , etc,and injured, which were very few--the numbers seem to be 56,29,31,28. For a team that doesn't usually have 85 on scholly all the time ,that seems a large number.Also, these were not chumps .There was some real talent going out the door. btw-Just for fun, I went back to compare an opponents number.I picked dook '14 because they didn't have coaching change. From that signed class of 18 ,dook had 15 still playing 4 yrs later.That's less than 17% compared to our 29 .A bunch of upperclass talent was there.--maybe a connection to why they beat us -easily.Anybody is welcome to check others. Would be interesting to see them. So getting the good recruits is tough, keeping them is tougher possibly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Interesting stat
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top