Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Institutionalized Takes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cpf2001" data-source="post: 922519" data-attributes="member: 6459"><p>What are the odds the people someone already has working for them are the best possible people for that job, if the current budget is on the small side? What are the odds that if the head guy had 2, 3, or more times as much money to play with, he couldn't tap his network and pull some higher-firepower candidates?</p><p></p><p>I think it would reflect poorly on their judgement and would be less inclined to hire them. It probably means either they're overly attached and valuing that over results, OR they just don't have a good network to tap for a new staff.</p><p></p><p>Stansbury said so himself that he bought fully into Collins's spiel, and the contract suggests he didn't give much thought to downsides or risk. Given where that's gotten us, I like an AD looking at things from a more critical perspective. (This is why I also don't want just a couple boosters having enough influence to call all the shots - people spending less time in the situation and less familiar with the details and approaching things fanatically instead of rigorously are not who should be making the final call.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cpf2001, post: 922519, member: 6459"] What are the odds the people someone already has working for them are the best possible people for that job, if the current budget is on the small side? What are the odds that if the head guy had 2, 3, or more times as much money to play with, he couldn't tap his network and pull some higher-firepower candidates? I think it would reflect poorly on their judgement and would be less inclined to hire them. It probably means either they're overly attached and valuing that over results, OR they just don't have a good network to tap for a new staff. Stansbury said so himself that he bought fully into Collins's spiel, and the contract suggests he didn't give much thought to downsides or risk. Given where that's gotten us, I like an AD looking at things from a more critical perspective. (This is why I also don't want just a couple boosters having enough influence to call all the shots - people spending less time in the situation and less familiar with the details and approaching things fanatically instead of rigorously are not who should be making the final call.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Institutionalized Takes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top