Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Incoming Transfers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 601107" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>If we have 50 players potentially getting big bucks to transfer, and we have 500 players who want to transfer and can’t because of the 50 players, is it right to penalize the majority because the minority of cheaters?</p><p></p><p>If you’re a great assistant tennis coach, Arkansas poaches you from Clemson and it’s the nature of the business. If they poach an unpaid athlete for three years, we lock down the transfer system. </p><p></p><p>And that doesn’t even get into the question of just how much interest the NCAA has in cracking down on real cheating. It’s just my opinion, but if the UNC academic scandal had happened to Dayton or Richmond or maybe even Gonzaga, those programs would have been crushed. </p><p></p><p>I haven’t checked the stats, but I’d bet if a student transfers to Alabama, and Alabama wants the hardship waiver, they get it. And Alabama is also much more able to stash a player for a year with a red shirt. At Western Kentucky or other less affluent programs, less so. </p><p></p><p>There seem to be a couple of rules to the NCAA:</p><p>1. Don’t kill the cash cows</p><p>2. The athletes don’t get a vote, so the restrictions go on them</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 601107, member: 282"] If we have 50 players potentially getting big bucks to transfer, and we have 500 players who want to transfer and can’t because of the 50 players, is it right to penalize the majority because the minority of cheaters? If you’re a great assistant tennis coach, Arkansas poaches you from Clemson and it’s the nature of the business. If they poach an unpaid athlete for three years, we lock down the transfer system. And that doesn’t even get into the question of just how much interest the NCAA has in cracking down on real cheating. It’s just my opinion, but if the UNC academic scandal had happened to Dayton or Richmond or maybe even Gonzaga, those programs would have been crushed. I haven’t checked the stats, but I’d bet if a student transfers to Alabama, and Alabama wants the hardship waiver, they get it. And Alabama is also much more able to stash a player for a year with a red shirt. At Western Kentucky or other less affluent programs, less so. There seem to be a couple of rules to the NCAA: 1. Don’t kill the cash cows 2. The athletes don’t get a vote, so the restrictions go on them Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Incoming Transfers?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top