Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Improved OL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketOff" data-source="post: 727882" data-attributes="member: 4572"><p>I’m split on whether I think not playing at all would be beneficial or detrimental to the rebuild. On one hand, Tech is very young, and an extra year to develop guys without a record to worry about would probably help us catch up some. On the other hand, a lot of the players who would be key components to a good season this year are RS Seniors and would be unlikely to come back for a 6th unless they were already in a grad school program. That includes 4/5 of the projected starting OL (Cochran, Johnson, Cooper, DeFoor), Jalen Camp, David Curry, Antonneous Clayton, and Jahaziel Lee. </p><p></p><p>It really depends on what would be allowed in the spring of ‘21. I highly doubt if no games are played this fall, and they aren’t moved to the spring that spring camps would be “business as usual.” Because Tech is so young, missing essentially 2 entire spring practice years would be detrimental to development and we may be worse off than if we had to take some beatings on the scoreboard this fall. </p><p></p><p>I think the best thing that could happen would be playing an 8-9 game conference or regional schedule where only conference championship games are played and there is no playoff or bowl games. That way everyone will be able to see how much progress is being made, and there will be something to compete for without records being relevant over the run. With the added bonus of a 0% chance of a Dwag national championship, and who wouldn’t want that?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketOff, post: 727882, member: 4572"] I’m split on whether I think not playing at all would be beneficial or detrimental to the rebuild. On one hand, Tech is very young, and an extra year to develop guys without a record to worry about would probably help us catch up some. On the other hand, a lot of the players who would be key components to a good season this year are RS Seniors and would be unlikely to come back for a 6th unless they were already in a grad school program. That includes 4/5 of the projected starting OL (Cochran, Johnson, Cooper, DeFoor), Jalen Camp, David Curry, Antonneous Clayton, and Jahaziel Lee. It really depends on what would be allowed in the spring of ‘21. I highly doubt if no games are played this fall, and they aren’t moved to the spring that spring camps would be “business as usual.” Because Tech is so young, missing essentially 2 entire spring practice years would be detrimental to development and we may be worse off than if we had to take some beatings on the scoreboard this fall. I think the best thing that could happen would be playing an 8-9 game conference or regional schedule where only conference championship games are played and there is no playoff or bowl games. That way everyone will be able to see how much progress is being made, and there will be something to compete for without records being relevant over the run. With the added bonus of a 0% chance of a Dwag national championship, and who wouldn’t want that? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Improved OL
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top