Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
I will be seriously PO'd
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 92363" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>Since you've made these points before, I'm sure that you are prepared to answer the questions addressed to some of these points earlier:</p><p>1) What data do you have that the offense limits recruiting? You assert this as a fact. Now if you are posting your opinion that it seems to you that our offense would limit recruiting, that's fine. However, it seems to me that asserting as fact that it does limit recruiting requires some data to substantiate it.</p><p></p><p>4) What's your standard for calling the ACC weak? The VPI team we beat had beat tOSU. The UNC team that beat us by less than a score played ND to less than a score. Duke played TxA&M close in a bowl game last year. UVA played UCLA to within a score. It may not be SEC strong, but the ACC doesn't seem to me to be that weak, especially compared to previous seasons. So, what's the standard for your assessment?</p><p></p><p>8) We've presented evidence previously that Stanford does not have minimum entrance requirements, no required HS courses, no required HS GPA, no required SAT or ACT scores. They also have easier majors. Why do you feel that you are not offering an apples vs oranges argument in raising this issue?</p><p></p><p>Thanks</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 92363, member: 195"] Since you've made these points before, I'm sure that you are prepared to answer the questions addressed to some of these points earlier: 1) What data do you have that the offense limits recruiting? You assert this as a fact. Now if you are posting your opinion that it seems to you that our offense would limit recruiting, that's fine. However, it seems to me that asserting as fact that it does limit recruiting requires some data to substantiate it. 4) What's your standard for calling the ACC weak? The VPI team we beat had beat tOSU. The UNC team that beat us by less than a score played ND to less than a score. Duke played TxA&M close in a bowl game last year. UVA played UCLA to within a score. It may not be SEC strong, but the ACC doesn't seem to me to be that weak, especially compared to previous seasons. So, what's the standard for your assessment? 8) We've presented evidence previously that Stanford does not have minimum entrance requirements, no required HS courses, no required HS GPA, no required SAT or ACT scores. They also have easier majors. Why do you feel that you are not offering an apples vs oranges argument in raising this issue? Thanks [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
I will be seriously PO'd
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top