Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
I want a run first pro style offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="33jacket" data-source="post: 49502" data-attributes="member: 628"><p>Chan called a different game than paul. Chan did not go for it on O. He would rather punt and pin an o inside the 20. How many times have you seen paul go for it on our side of the field putting the d in a bad spot? How many times did chan do this? How you play each unit off each other helps or hurts the other both ways. Chan coached to help the d. Period. He was probably overly conservative. By the same token pauls death marches are a total asset too. We saw that very few times last year. And i do think our d tired alot. Uga. Look up the snaps the d played at halftime vs clemson. It was high. Of course one reason is they couldnt get off the field. The other was the o couldnt stay on it. </p><p></p><p>Chan put his athletes on d. We had more depth on d. We did not tire as easy. We had good line rotations. Paul doesnt do that. He starts his athletes on o. We are not deep on d. We do get tired. And yes we fired the strength coach neal. And just now brought in sisk. Chan had ciano. So u r right. Good point. Again. Different coach philosophy. Better strength coach under chan. If chan has this roster on d even with tenuta his d would tire. Would we give up as many points? Not sure i dont think so because of how he played the field position game. But paul has issues all around.</p><p></p><p>Our d kept us in that unc game. Pitt game. Uva game. As far as clemson scored midway through the third despite the bad o was not ba</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="33jacket, post: 49502, member: 628"] Chan called a different game than paul. Chan did not go for it on O. He would rather punt and pin an o inside the 20. How many times have you seen paul go for it on our side of the field putting the d in a bad spot? How many times did chan do this? How you play each unit off each other helps or hurts the other both ways. Chan coached to help the d. Period. He was probably overly conservative. By the same token pauls death marches are a total asset too. We saw that very few times last year. And i do think our d tired alot. Uga. Look up the snaps the d played at halftime vs clemson. It was high. Of course one reason is they couldnt get off the field. The other was the o couldnt stay on it. Chan put his athletes on d. We had more depth on d. We did not tire as easy. We had good line rotations. Paul doesnt do that. He starts his athletes on o. We are not deep on d. We do get tired. And yes we fired the strength coach neal. And just now brought in sisk. Chan had ciano. So u r right. Good point. Again. Different coach philosophy. Better strength coach under chan. If chan has this roster on d even with tenuta his d would tire. Would we give up as many points? Not sure i dont think so because of how he played the field position game. But paul has issues all around. Our d kept us in that unc game. Pitt game. Uva game. As far as clemson scored midway through the third despite the bad o was not ba [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
I want a run first pro style offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top