Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
I really just don’t understand…
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jacketup" data-source="post: 998929" data-attributes="member: 630"><p>This team has been very consistent. They can't shoot/score. That fact has been consistent throughout the year. 4 of the 5 starters combined to go 2 for 24 yesterday. That has to be some kind of a record. In the prior game they missed, what, 20 shots in a row? That has to be some kind of record too.</p><p></p><p>The Duke and UNC wins say more about the opposition than about Tech. Duke, with it's one and done model, was a very young team in December. UNC had a poor shooting night against Tech, starting with 53% from the line. That may be a modern record for UNC. The UNC win was not because Tech was suddenly a great team as much as UNC had an off night. </p><p></p><p>I'd be starting Murphy, since he seems to be the only one who consistently scores the ball. He was 3/4 and 2/2 yesterday. The player that has been inconsistent is Kelly. He had a good shooting day, but that has been the exception. The rest of the team can transfer and I'd be OK with it. </p><p></p><p>I still give the coach the benefit of the doubt. I hope he has learned that having guys who can score the ball is the main thing. Great athletes who can't score need to find another sport. </p><p></p><p>On the other subject, anyone who thinks Cremins was even an average X's and O's coach doesn't know X's and O's. His good teams ALL had a PG that was either a superstar or a coach's son (or both). Those PGs covered up his lack of skill as a teacher of the game. His teams played hard for him though, and that is important.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jacketup, post: 998929, member: 630"] This team has been very consistent. They can't shoot/score. That fact has been consistent throughout the year. 4 of the 5 starters combined to go 2 for 24 yesterday. That has to be some kind of a record. In the prior game they missed, what, 20 shots in a row? That has to be some kind of record too. The Duke and UNC wins say more about the opposition than about Tech. Duke, with it's one and done model, was a very young team in December. UNC had a poor shooting night against Tech, starting with 53% from the line. That may be a modern record for UNC. The UNC win was not because Tech was suddenly a great team as much as UNC had an off night. I'd be starting Murphy, since he seems to be the only one who consistently scores the ball. He was 3/4 and 2/2 yesterday. The player that has been inconsistent is Kelly. He had a good shooting day, but that has been the exception. The rest of the team can transfer and I'd be OK with it. I still give the coach the benefit of the doubt. I hope he has learned that having guys who can score the ball is the main thing. Great athletes who can't score need to find another sport. On the other subject, anyone who thinks Cremins was even an average X's and O's coach doesn't know X's and O's. His good teams ALL had a PG that was either a superstar or a coach's son (or both). Those PGs covered up his lack of skill as a teacher of the game. His teams played hard for him though, and that is important. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
I really just don’t understand…
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top