Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
How 'Should' Tech Do in Recruiting Rank - Analysis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Techster" data-source="post: 510399" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>I get what you're saying, but again, let's drill down and not talk generalities in terms of what we <em><strong>THINK</strong></em> we need to spend and what is really happening. </p><p></p><p>Let's take 2018 recruiting class rankings and GT for instance. </p><p></p><p><a href="https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CompositeTeamRankings/" target="_blank">https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CompositeTeamRankings/</a></p><p></p><p>The 30th ranked team was Louisville. They signed a combined 4 4star recruits, and 23 total recruits.</p><p></p><p>GT had the 54th ranked class. We signed a combined 2 4 star guys (in an odd year, one of them was a 4 star offensive player...JG), and a 21 total recruits.</p><p></p><p>If you follow my logic that if GT can sign 2-4 defensive 4 stars per year, we should be able to match it on the offensive side...hence recruiting classes in the 30's. </p><p></p><p>The fact is, and CGC touched on it, GT has advantages most schools do not. We have an elite education, we are located in an opportunity rich/world class city, and we can offer anything any of P5 school can. GT just didn't take advantage of it, or we had a system that turned off recruits. Now whether or not CGC is the right coach to take advantage of it, we're going to find out real soon.</p><p></p><p>Recruiting in the 30's should not be that hard. It's hard if one side of the ball is system kids want nothing to do with...but that impediment will change going forward.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Techster, post: 510399, member: 360"] I get what you're saying, but again, let's drill down and not talk generalities in terms of what we [I][B]THINK[/B][/I] we need to spend and what is really happening. Let's take 2018 recruiting class rankings and GT for instance. [URL]https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CompositeTeamRankings/[/URL] The 30th ranked team was Louisville. They signed a combined 4 4star recruits, and 23 total recruits. GT had the 54th ranked class. We signed a combined 2 4 star guys (in an odd year, one of them was a 4 star offensive player...JG), and a 21 total recruits. If you follow my logic that if GT can sign 2-4 defensive 4 stars per year, we should be able to match it on the offensive side...hence recruiting classes in the 30's. The fact is, and CGC touched on it, GT has advantages most schools do not. We have an elite education, we are located in an opportunity rich/world class city, and we can offer anything any of P5 school can. GT just didn't take advantage of it, or we had a system that turned off recruits. Now whether or not CGC is the right coach to take advantage of it, we're going to find out real soon. Recruiting in the 30's should not be that hard. It's hard if one side of the ball is system kids want nothing to do with...but that impediment will change going forward. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
How 'Should' Tech Do in Recruiting Rank - Analysis
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top