Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
How 'Should' Tech Do in Recruiting Rank - Analysis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Techster" data-source="post: 510331" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>Some here ignore one simple fact: GT was getting 4 star players under CPJ. We were actually getting an OK amount of them as well. They were 90% on the defensive side. </p><p></p><p>Now imagine if the offense matched the defense with signing 4 star recruits. That's going to happen because the new offense will attract the 2-4+ 4 star (possibly 5 star?!) offensive recruits that wanted nothing to do with a pure option system. </p><p></p><p>If we do that we'll fall in the top 20's-30's in recruiting rankings. That is not wishful thinking, that's just an educated extrapolation of our offensive recruiting mirroring our defensive recruiting. </p><p></p><p>GT just isn't set up to be a top 10 recruiting school, nor are we set up to be school that can sign a 2007 class every year. But we can consistently sign top 20 to top 30 classes. IMO, recruiting classes in the 30's should be our floor. Once every 3-5 years maybe everything works out and we have another 2007 class. </p><p></p><p>The fun part is now we have a coach that thinks in the same vein, and sounds like he doesn't want to hear excuses. He wants results. </p><p></p><p>Time will tell if "GT historical patterns" that some like to box us in hold true, or if it was just a confluence of years where recruiting was just not good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Techster, post: 510331, member: 360"] Some here ignore one simple fact: GT was getting 4 star players under CPJ. We were actually getting an OK amount of them as well. They were 90% on the defensive side. Now imagine if the offense matched the defense with signing 4 star recruits. That's going to happen because the new offense will attract the 2-4+ 4 star (possibly 5 star?!) offensive recruits that wanted nothing to do with a pure option system. If we do that we'll fall in the top 20's-30's in recruiting rankings. That is not wishful thinking, that's just an educated extrapolation of our offensive recruiting mirroring our defensive recruiting. GT just isn't set up to be a top 10 recruiting school, nor are we set up to be school that can sign a 2007 class every year. But we can consistently sign top 20 to top 30 classes. IMO, recruiting classes in the 30's should be our floor. Once every 3-5 years maybe everything works out and we have another 2007 class. The fun part is now we have a coach that thinks in the same vein, and sounds like he doesn't want to hear excuses. He wants results. Time will tell if "GT historical patterns" that some like to box us in hold true, or if it was just a confluence of years where recruiting was just not good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
How 'Should' Tech Do in Recruiting Rank - Analysis
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top