Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
How long does it take to install the option?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="4shotB" data-source="post: 437765" data-attributes="member: 844"><p>I think he question posed in the OP is a fascinating topic. And I think the answer is alluded to in these responses. If you are the AD at one of these forlorn outposts (Kansas, 'Cuse, etc.) you would look at GT and ask if it has produced tangible results? I think it would be easy to draw for an outsider to study the situation (without looking at other issues and underlying factors) and conclude that the offense didn't move the needle all that much in terms of overall W's and L's. (Of course we all know the variation has been much greater under CPJ's tenure).</p><p></p><p>So, if overall team (not offense) results running this O, under the recognized expert in the subject matter, aren't that much different, do you take the risk? On one hand, you might sell it as a differing approach (after all, these places have cycled through a bunch of coaches) that is worth a gamble. What do you have to lose? OTOH, I don't think you can point to GT and its offensive system as a panacea for competing with the schools with more tradition, resources, etc. I don't think the typical college FB fan would perceive it as such. And it would be risky for an AD to sell it that way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="4shotB, post: 437765, member: 844"] I think he question posed in the OP is a fascinating topic. And I think the answer is alluded to in these responses. If you are the AD at one of these forlorn outposts (Kansas, 'Cuse, etc.) you would look at GT and ask if it has produced tangible results? I think it would be easy to draw for an outsider to study the situation (without looking at other issues and underlying factors) and conclude that the offense didn't move the needle all that much in terms of overall W's and L's. (Of course we all know the variation has been much greater under CPJ's tenure). So, if overall team (not offense) results running this O, under the recognized expert in the subject matter, aren't that much different, do you take the risk? On one hand, you might sell it as a differing approach (after all, these places have cycled through a bunch of coaches) that is worth a gamble. What do you have to lose? OTOH, I don't think you can point to GT and its offensive system as a panacea for competing with the schools with more tradition, resources, etc. I don't think the typical college FB fan would perceive it as such. And it would be risky for an AD to sell it that way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
How long does it take to install the option?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top