Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Hire Fast, Fire Slow?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 868431" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>If speaking about the AA, it would be possible for the AD to leave and the bureaucracy to continue running. The AA would have to keep checks on coaches and employees, but it could continue to host events, make payroll, sell tickets, keep up the facilities, etc. while a new AD is being found. That would be very similar to a for profit business as you are indicating.</p><p></p><p>However, my post, and unless I misunderstand the OP, the purpose of this thread is with regard to a long search for a HC. I listed reasons that I think a search for a HC that extended a long time after the current/previous coach leaves would be disastrous for a football program. That isn't the same as a business.</p><p></p><p>Also, as I suggested in my previous post, it would be possible to have a year long search for a new coach and still replace the outgoing coach very soon after he leaves. That search would just have to be more quiet and less public than the usual search. I hope that GT is already engaging in quiet off the record discussions for HC, and if the big boosters really want to get rid of TStan then for AD also. Off the record discussions wouldn't mean that either of them would have to go, but if they do go, the GTAA would be in a much better situation if those searches and discussions are already taking place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 868431, member: 2426"] If speaking about the AA, it would be possible for the AD to leave and the bureaucracy to continue running. The AA would have to keep checks on coaches and employees, but it could continue to host events, make payroll, sell tickets, keep up the facilities, etc. while a new AD is being found. That would be very similar to a for profit business as you are indicating. However, my post, and unless I misunderstand the OP, the purpose of this thread is with regard to a long search for a HC. I listed reasons that I think a search for a HC that extended a long time after the current/previous coach leaves would be disastrous for a football program. That isn't the same as a business. Also, as I suggested in my previous post, it would be possible to have a year long search for a new coach and still replace the outgoing coach very soon after he leaves. That search would just have to be more quiet and less public than the usual search. I hope that GT is already engaging in quiet off the record discussions for HC, and if the big boosters really want to get rid of TStan then for AD also. Off the record discussions wouldn't mean that either of them would have to go, but if they do go, the GTAA would be in a much better situation if those searches and discussions are already taking place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Hire Fast, Fire Slow?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top