Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Hey boys, you guys might enjoy this (you might not)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ilovetheoption" data-source="post: 610321" data-attributes="member: 1414"><p> <ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Southern. LOL, just COULDN'T BE more stereotypical SoCal <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Soooo, yes, you could do all that stuff, and maybe next year. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">We're probably not going to start installing wings until halfway through the season anyhow. These kids have to learn the I fundamentals, because in the past they were purely a spread gun team that ran inside zone, outside zone, and called QB run off those looks (they didn't even read the backside end for the QB constraint).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Right now, they're just repping the living F out of Power, Counter, Lead (ISO), Dive and Toss every day. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If they can execute those 4, along with possibly Dive Follow, Dive Option and POSSIBLY Lead Weak and Dive Weak, that's plenty for week one. We're calling PCLDT the "base" running game that MUST be installed and solid for week 1. He feels pretty good about base right now, so I think we're probably pretty good about getting Dive Follow and Dive Option in.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For right now, though, it's just I formation, no wings. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">THAT SAID.....</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">I'm not as big a fan of arc motion as some folks are<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The shallow arc motion you're describing is what I have in mind for my shuffle motion. (I'm defining shuffle motion as slide stepping motion where the wing keeps his shoulders parallel to the line of scrimmage, rather than turning and facing the sideline)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I see how arc motion could be an advantage on toss, and how maybe how even the head of steam would be an advantage on power (although I think you'd get to the end/edge too quickly in power and goof up the timing)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">That said, shuffle motion gets you faced in the right direction for Dive/Counter/Lead/Kick/Midline looks, and all the associated plays off of those looks). I feel like asking B or S to be heading laterally and then wrap tight on the QB, get their eyes right, and get on target is asking for bad tracks. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I think shuffle motion gives you just as much tip on coverage as arc motion does (or almost as much, anyhow, because you're not threatening fly sweep)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">So basically you sacrifice a little outside explosiveness for the ability to execute the full suite of I formation running game. </li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Yes, I get that Matt Canada's stuff is football porn. <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I'm a HUGE fan of all the dressing up he does to just run basic stuff. Gives the defense a million looks, but the offense has simple, repeatable, predictable, executable assignments. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I also thought about that exact triple option action you're describing, and actually you could do it frontside OR as a counter option, where the back wraps around the qb, who reads the BACKSIDE end (you'd have to block the frontside end and take it way wide andoption the next guy (OLB or maybe even the CB). Again though, I've been told no triple option, and Again, I feel like having that fullback in arc motion is asking for a weird/bad mesh/track.</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">I will say, you are clearly thinking similar to how I'm thinking. This is the stuff I had in mind when I thought about inverting Johnson's system.</li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ilovetheoption, post: 610321, member: 1414"] [LIST=1] [*]Southern. LOL, just COULDN'T BE more stereotypical SoCal :) [LIST] [*]Soooo, yes, you could do all that stuff, and maybe next year. [*]We're probably not going to start installing wings until halfway through the season anyhow. These kids have to learn the I fundamentals, because in the past they were purely a spread gun team that ran inside zone, outside zone, and called QB run off those looks (they didn't even read the backside end for the QB constraint). [*]Right now, they're just repping the living F out of Power, Counter, Lead (ISO), Dive and Toss every day. [*]If they can execute those 4, along with possibly Dive Follow, Dive Option and POSSIBLY Lead Weak and Dive Weak, that's plenty for week one. We're calling PCLDT the "base" running game that MUST be installed and solid for week 1. He feels pretty good about base right now, so I think we're probably pretty good about getting Dive Follow and Dive Option in. [*]For right now, though, it's just I formation, no wings. [*]THAT SAID..... [/LIST] [*]I'm not as big a fan of arc motion as some folks are [LIST] [*]The shallow arc motion you're describing is what I have in mind for my shuffle motion. (I'm defining shuffle motion as slide stepping motion where the wing keeps his shoulders parallel to the line of scrimmage, rather than turning and facing the sideline) [*]I see how arc motion could be an advantage on toss, and how maybe how even the head of steam would be an advantage on power (although I think you'd get to the end/edge too quickly in power and goof up the timing) [*]That said, shuffle motion gets you faced in the right direction for Dive/Counter/Lead/Kick/Midline looks, and all the associated plays off of those looks). I feel like asking B or S to be heading laterally and then wrap tight on the QB, get their eyes right, and get on target is asking for bad tracks. [*]I think shuffle motion gives you just as much tip on coverage as arc motion does (or almost as much, anyhow, because you're not threatening fly sweep) [*]So basically you sacrifice a little outside explosiveness for the ability to execute the full suite of I formation running game. [/LIST] [*]Yes, I get that Matt Canada's stuff is football porn. [LIST] [*]I'm a HUGE fan of all the dressing up he does to just run basic stuff. Gives the defense a million looks, but the offense has simple, repeatable, predictable, executable assignments. [*]I also thought about that exact triple option action you're describing, and actually you could do it frontside OR as a counter option, where the back wraps around the qb, who reads the BACKSIDE end (you'd have to block the frontside end and take it way wide andoption the next guy (OLB or maybe even the CB). Again though, I've been told no triple option, and Again, I feel like having that fullback in arc motion is asking for a weird/bad mesh/track. [/LIST] [*]I will say, you are clearly thinking similar to how I'm thinking. This is the stuff I had in mind when I thought about inverting Johnson's system. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Hey boys, you guys might enjoy this (you might not)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top