Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
HC Candidate/Rumors/Info Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 909896" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>The biggest factor in terms of contracts is what the coaches want vs what the schools are willing to pay. </p><p></p><p>The "need" for the longer contracts and buyout is because that is what is needed to get the coaches to sign. </p><p></p><p>Anyways, as far as recruiting goes, it doesn't really change anything. Kids don't usually sign with a school, at least at this level, with the idea that they will transfer in a year or two. So if you have a HC with only one year remaining, it will still be used against him in recruiting. Yes, the player could transfer if he is fired. But why go there and then have to transfer if you can go to a place where the coach you are committing to will more likely stay around? </p><p></p><p>Whether that is true or not is not really important. What is important is you don't want the administration to get a reputation for hamstringing coaches like that. Because then it's harder to lure the next coach there. </p><p></p><p>But in general, coaching contracts will continue to be based around what it takes to lure coaches to the job more than anything else.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 909896, member: 2299"] The biggest factor in terms of contracts is what the coaches want vs what the schools are willing to pay. The "need" for the longer contracts and buyout is because that is what is needed to get the coaches to sign. Anyways, as far as recruiting goes, it doesn't really change anything. Kids don't usually sign with a school, at least at this level, with the idea that they will transfer in a year or two. So if you have a HC with only one year remaining, it will still be used against him in recruiting. Yes, the player could transfer if he is fired. But why go there and then have to transfer if you can go to a place where the coach you are committing to will more likely stay around? Whether that is true or not is not really important. What is important is you don't want the administration to get a reputation for hamstringing coaches like that. Because then it's harder to lure the next coach there. But in general, coaching contracts will continue to be based around what it takes to lure coaches to the job more than anything else. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
HC Candidate/Rumors/Info Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top