Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
HC Candidate/Rumors/Info Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gt2019" data-source="post: 909369" data-attributes="member: 5119"><p>Going to list HC candidates with their positives and negatives. </p><p></p><p>Deion Sanders: </p><p>Positives: Would bring a lot of needed good attention to the program when it needs it the most, would put fans back in the stands which is what tech needs desperately, Deion would attract lots of side walk fans, the NIL deals with Deion at the helm would be insane. He already has ties to barstool with him being apart of a podcast there and a NIL deal from barstool sports helped get Travis Hunter there. Deion would also recruit at the top of the ACC, it would be around 3rd in the acc just behind Florida state and then Clemson. The talent I’ve heard he would bring in is truly remarkable. </p><p>Negatives: He brings a lot of attention to himself, it’s both a positive and a negative. We saw how CGC had a lot of attention to himself and how he portrayed himself to the media. I don’t think it would be weird like CGC but you have to ask yourself, is Deion all about Deion or is it a mixture of coaching, recruits, program and himself. He’s not experienced. His first college job is at a HBCU where he has a lot more talent. You have to wonder is he actually coaching and developing this kids up or is he out talenting other schools. </p><p>Conclusion: Extremely risky but the results could be outstanding. </p><p></p><p>Garret Riley:</p><p>Positives: Young offensive mastermind, runs the same offense as his older brother Lincoln and we’ve seen how it’s translated to being a HC, appears to be extremely smart in the way he speaks of his offensive philosophies and thoughts. What you’re hoping here is that he’s like his older brother Lincoln. They’ve followed a similar career path and Garret appears to be an exact replica of Lincoln when Lincoln was this age and this point of his career. Offensive coordinator for a potential playoff team would be a very good hire to be your HC, his offense ranks very highly nationally, in 1 year has developed Max Duggan into a very good QB when it wasn’t even know if he was going to be the starter. </p><p>Negatives: Young, being young can be a positive and a negative. You would always like a really experienced guy but those type of candidates are looking at bigger schools or already at bigger schools. </p><p>Conclusion: I think Garrett Riley would be an amazing hire. I think he’s the next Lincoln Riley or similar too in terms of their minds. You would be snatching up a guy before the massive schools like an Auburn, Ole Miss, Texas, Texas A&M come calling. </p><p>BOB:</p><p>Positives: Been at tech already and knows the challenges of coaching here. He’s not a tech guy, he’s just worked here before. He truly did a remarkable job at Penn state fixing that mess, successful as a HC in the NFL and always made the playoffs. No non sense type of guy. Would bring stability to the program. </p><p>Negatives: He’s a vanilla offensive kind, he runs the same plays over and over at bama and the bama talent is making that work. He’s an extremely boring guy to deal with from what I’ve heard, doesn’t have much to say, just boring all around. You know he wants to go to the NFL and could leave in a few years but it might not be a bad thing if he fixes the program. </p><p>Conclusion: Boring hire but you could do much worse. May leave in a few years for the NFL, could get bigger job offers, you don’t know how he would recruit here since he is very boring.</p><p></p><p>Jamey Chadwell: </p><p>Positives: Built multiple programs from the ground up, doing nothing but winning at CCU, true offensive mind that seems to know what he’s doing. Working through the college ranks and hasn’t struggled anywhere so far. </p><p>Negatives: You wonder how he would recruit in the P5, doesn’t have any P5 experience, option style offense but he does pass a lot. You have to wonder how an offensive style offense would translate to recruiting. He might bring his entire staff from CCU to Tech. You generally want to provide a guy like that with highly paid experienced P5 coaches since he lacks the P5 experience. </p><p>Conclusion: Jamey would be a very solid hire, can’t go wrong with him. You obviously want to figure out how he would recruit here and who his staff would be. </p><p></p><p>Dell McGee: I’ve touched on McGee a lot on here so I don’t think I need to list him again. Just go back and look at my post about him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gt2019, post: 909369, member: 5119"] Going to list HC candidates with their positives and negatives. Deion Sanders: Positives: Would bring a lot of needed good attention to the program when it needs it the most, would put fans back in the stands which is what tech needs desperately, Deion would attract lots of side walk fans, the NIL deals with Deion at the helm would be insane. He already has ties to barstool with him being apart of a podcast there and a NIL deal from barstool sports helped get Travis Hunter there. Deion would also recruit at the top of the ACC, it would be around 3rd in the acc just behind Florida state and then Clemson. The talent I’ve heard he would bring in is truly remarkable. Negatives: He brings a lot of attention to himself, it’s both a positive and a negative. We saw how CGC had a lot of attention to himself and how he portrayed himself to the media. I don’t think it would be weird like CGC but you have to ask yourself, is Deion all about Deion or is it a mixture of coaching, recruits, program and himself. He’s not experienced. His first college job is at a HBCU where he has a lot more talent. You have to wonder is he actually coaching and developing this kids up or is he out talenting other schools. Conclusion: Extremely risky but the results could be outstanding. Garret Riley: Positives: Young offensive mastermind, runs the same offense as his older brother Lincoln and we’ve seen how it’s translated to being a HC, appears to be extremely smart in the way he speaks of his offensive philosophies and thoughts. What you’re hoping here is that he’s like his older brother Lincoln. They’ve followed a similar career path and Garret appears to be an exact replica of Lincoln when Lincoln was this age and this point of his career. Offensive coordinator for a potential playoff team would be a very good hire to be your HC, his offense ranks very highly nationally, in 1 year has developed Max Duggan into a very good QB when it wasn’t even know if he was going to be the starter. Negatives: Young, being young can be a positive and a negative. You would always like a really experienced guy but those type of candidates are looking at bigger schools or already at bigger schools. Conclusion: I think Garrett Riley would be an amazing hire. I think he’s the next Lincoln Riley or similar too in terms of their minds. You would be snatching up a guy before the massive schools like an Auburn, Ole Miss, Texas, Texas A&M come calling. BOB: Positives: Been at tech already and knows the challenges of coaching here. He’s not a tech guy, he’s just worked here before. He truly did a remarkable job at Penn state fixing that mess, successful as a HC in the NFL and always made the playoffs. No non sense type of guy. Would bring stability to the program. Negatives: He’s a vanilla offensive kind, he runs the same plays over and over at bama and the bama talent is making that work. He’s an extremely boring guy to deal with from what I’ve heard, doesn’t have much to say, just boring all around. You know he wants to go to the NFL and could leave in a few years but it might not be a bad thing if he fixes the program. Conclusion: Boring hire but you could do much worse. May leave in a few years for the NFL, could get bigger job offers, you don’t know how he would recruit here since he is very boring. Jamey Chadwell: Positives: Built multiple programs from the ground up, doing nothing but winning at CCU, true offensive mind that seems to know what he’s doing. Working through the college ranks and hasn’t struggled anywhere so far. Negatives: You wonder how he would recruit in the P5, doesn’t have any P5 experience, option style offense but he does pass a lot. You have to wonder how an offensive style offense would translate to recruiting. He might bring his entire staff from CCU to Tech. You generally want to provide a guy like that with highly paid experienced P5 coaches since he lacks the P5 experience. Conclusion: Jamey would be a very solid hire, can’t go wrong with him. You obviously want to figure out how he would recruit here and who his staff would be. Dell McGee: I’ve touched on McGee a lot on here so I don’t think I need to list him again. Just go back and look at my post about him. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
HC Candidate/Rumors/Info Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top