Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
#GTvsCLEM Postgame
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="InsideLB" data-source="post: 825171" data-attributes="member: 857"><p>Further Game Thoughts:</p><p></p><p>Offense / Special Teams</p><p></p><p>We had some success running the ball on the perimeter when we got the ball out there quick and when we got the ball to Dante. Some folks asked why Dontae isn’t in there more and my guess is blocking. Possibly he does not run with as much power as Gibbs/Mason as well between the tackles.</p><p></p><p>All that said, I thought we could have done more with the success we had on the quick perimeter. First, we could have done it a little more. Clemson is no fool and would have responded to when Dante is in there and we are telegraphing the quick outside run. That leads me to #2: off quick outside run action we possibly could have tried bootleg/reverse action.</p><p></p><p>To be my own devil’s advocate, such plays are tempting fate against a D like Clemson’s. Also the few plays I watched on the condensed game the backside it appeared well-disciplined and guys stayed at home/ stayed square. But I wonder if on the goal line some sort of outside run boot action to a guy in the flats with option to run could have worked.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Folks said our play calling at the goal line was bad. On the other hand no one has scored an offensive touchdown vs Clemson this year and a good defense gets a lift in the redzone by having less field to protect. Mason’s a threat downhill and Dante is a threat wide so I thought something off that action might have worked.</p><p></p><p>All in all we outgained Clemson so it’s hard for me to fault play calling. I thought we did some rather clever things.</p><p></p><p>Punting:</p><p></p><p>Missed Harvin this game. The new kid needs time to develop obviously. His rugby punts didn’t seem to roll and his punts to pin folks deep seemed to roll massively into the end zone. However I am spoiled by Harvin and our tr-fr had never played in a live game until this season. Protection and coverage where pretty good I thought.</p><p></p><p>PK:</p><p></p><p>I thought the statements that things had not improved after NIU were overblown while also respecting the fact that it appeared to be a continuance of a trend. The last two games we have made all our FGs and protected well.</p><p></p><p>KO:</p><p></p><p>Stewart is good kicking off, period. Touchbacks and an onside kick that took the perfect high bounce. Will be interesting when Cigmalia leaves to see if Stewart can add accuracy to the cannon of a leg he has. Note the P/PK recruit we have verballed can also kick the daylights out of the ball.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="InsideLB, post: 825171, member: 857"] Further Game Thoughts: Offense / Special Teams We had some success running the ball on the perimeter when we got the ball out there quick and when we got the ball to Dante. Some folks asked why Dontae isn’t in there more and my guess is blocking. Possibly he does not run with as much power as Gibbs/Mason as well between the tackles. All that said, I thought we could have done more with the success we had on the quick perimeter. First, we could have done it a little more. Clemson is no fool and would have responded to when Dante is in there and we are telegraphing the quick outside run. That leads me to #2: off quick outside run action we possibly could have tried bootleg/reverse action. To be my own devil’s advocate, such plays are tempting fate against a D like Clemson’s. Also the few plays I watched on the condensed game the backside it appeared well-disciplined and guys stayed at home/ stayed square. But I wonder if on the goal line some sort of outside run boot action to a guy in the flats with option to run could have worked. Folks said our play calling at the goal line was bad. On the other hand no one has scored an offensive touchdown vs Clemson this year and a good defense gets a lift in the redzone by having less field to protect. Mason’s a threat downhill and Dante is a threat wide so I thought something off that action might have worked. All in all we outgained Clemson so it’s hard for me to fault play calling. I thought we did some rather clever things. Punting: Missed Harvin this game. The new kid needs time to develop obviously. His rugby punts didn’t seem to roll and his punts to pin folks deep seemed to roll massively into the end zone. However I am spoiled by Harvin and our tr-fr had never played in a live game until this season. Protection and coverage where pretty good I thought. PK: I thought the statements that things had not improved after NIU were overblown while also respecting the fact that it appeared to be a continuance of a trend. The last two games we have made all our FGs and protected well. KO: Stewart is good kicking off, period. Touchbacks and an onside kick that took the perfect high bounce. Will be interesting when Cigmalia leaves to see if Stewart can add accuracy to the cannon of a leg he has. Note the P/PK recruit we have verballed can also kick the daylights out of the ball. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
#GTvsCLEM Postgame
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top