Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
#GTvsCLEM Postgame
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 824989" data-attributes="member: 282"><p> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Yates seems to have everyone’s belief that he can march them down the field and win. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">After the KSU game, one poster said that he’d heard that some plays weren’t getting called for Yates because he wasn’t good at them. I don’t think I saw a read option in the Clemson game either. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Sims is faster, has a stronger arm, and is taller. If he could also do what Yates is doing—good completion rate, maintaining possession of the ball, looking off his reads quickly and effectively—he’d be one of the best QBs in the NCAA and on track for the NFL. Yates stepping up could be one of the best things possible for Sims if he also steps up and makes a real QB controversy. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Yates had a ~61% completion percentage and was behind most of the game. For a team on the road and behind from the first quarter to a top 10 team and a top defense, that’s efficient. Our yards per catch were solid and our yards per attempt were enough to move the sticks. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">On offense, what hurt us was the lack of explosive plays. We had a few, but for the most part Clemson’s defense kept us in front of them. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Oh, I wish our offense could play FSU. They let fast players get around or behind them. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Clemson’s defense is one of the better defenses out there to frustrate Gibbs. They’re fast all over and sure tacklers. Gibbs is shifty and can find the holes in the defense to make a big play. Clemson didn’t have many (maybe not any) holes to find. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I’m impressed by the game our defensive line had. Clemson’s offensive line may not be amazing (they might be really good), but they’re all highly recruited and we mostly bowed up and gave them some grief. We got in the backfield some and got some TFLs and a couple of fumbles. The safety was a big havoc play. </li> </ul><p>I’ll write more later. Some stats are still coming in</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 824989, member: 282"] [LIST] [*]Yates seems to have everyone’s belief that he can march them down the field and win. [*]After the KSU game, one poster said that he’d heard that some plays weren’t getting called for Yates because he wasn’t good at them. I don’t think I saw a read option in the Clemson game either. [*]Sims is faster, has a stronger arm, and is taller. If he could also do what Yates is doing—good completion rate, maintaining possession of the ball, looking off his reads quickly and effectively—he’d be one of the best QBs in the NCAA and on track for the NFL. Yates stepping up could be one of the best things possible for Sims if he also steps up and makes a real QB controversy. [*]Yates had a ~61% completion percentage and was behind most of the game. For a team on the road and behind from the first quarter to a top 10 team and a top defense, that’s efficient. Our yards per catch were solid and our yards per attempt were enough to move the sticks. [*]On offense, what hurt us was the lack of explosive plays. We had a few, but for the most part Clemson’s defense kept us in front of them. [*]Oh, I wish our offense could play FSU. They let fast players get around or behind them. [*]Clemson’s defense is one of the better defenses out there to frustrate Gibbs. They’re fast all over and sure tacklers. Gibbs is shifty and can find the holes in the defense to make a big play. Clemson didn’t have many (maybe not any) holes to find. [*]I’m impressed by the game our defensive line had. Clemson’s offensive line may not be amazing (they might be really good), but they’re all highly recruited and we mostly bowed up and gave them some grief. We got in the backfield some and got some TFLs and a couple of fumbles. The safety was a big havoc play. [/LIST] I’ll write more later. Some stats are still coming in [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
#GTvsCLEM Postgame
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top