Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT Special Teams Versus MSU
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTNavyNuke" data-source="post: 120164" data-attributes="member: 322"><p>Thanks, it took more work to start then I had a format I followed. Yup, that was Rodwell and not Butker punting.</p><p></p><p>I don't think the attrition we had affected our STs much. It seems that we were more than happy to fair catch punts and not be super aggressive on the returns. Allowed for more people to stay back and prevent fakes. Also on Kick Off returns, I don't think we were real aggressive.</p><p></p><p>Again, like Cuse listed here are my good, indifferent and bad ratings for the year:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Good - KOs by Butker, Extra points made, blocked FGs and blocked opponent punts.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Indifferent - KO and punt returns, Rodwell punting consistency (started off real good and faded).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Bad - Butker FG consistency (except for UGAg last FG!) </li> </ul><p>We have a lot of room to improve in punting and FGs this year. I don't know that we will get more aggressive in returns - the upside is a shorter field and the downside is less TOP and having our D on the field more. </p><p></p><p>But I sure hope our STs are better than #31 next year. The big reason Fluke went as far as they did is they were #1 for a bit of the season; we should do better too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTNavyNuke, post: 120164, member: 322"] Thanks, it took more work to start then I had a format I followed. Yup, that was Rodwell and not Butker punting. I don't think the attrition we had affected our STs much. It seems that we were more than happy to fair catch punts and not be super aggressive on the returns. Allowed for more people to stay back and prevent fakes. Also on Kick Off returns, I don't think we were real aggressive. Again, like Cuse listed here are my good, indifferent and bad ratings for the year: [LIST] [*]Good - KOs by Butker, Extra points made, blocked FGs and blocked opponent punts. [*]Indifferent - KO and punt returns, Rodwell punting consistency (started off real good and faded). [*]Bad - Butker FG consistency (except for UGAg last FG!) [/LIST] We have a lot of room to improve in punting and FGs this year. I don't know that we will get more aggressive in returns - the upside is a shorter field and the downside is less TOP and having our D on the field more. But I sure hope our STs are better than #31 next year. The big reason Fluke went as far as they did is they were #1 for a bit of the season; we should do better too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT Special Teams Versus MSU
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top