Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
GT Hoops Assistant Coaches Hot List
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ramblinwreck1378" data-source="post: 413011" data-attributes="member: 1108"><p>I think a big reason why they did that was because CPJ asked for it. He's got some clout being here 10+ years, and I think he was able to build a legitimate business case and present that to Stansbury. His selling point was essentially that we cannot compete with even middle of the pack P5 programs in terms of both quantity and quality of staff with the current budget. With Pastner still on his initial deal, he may have to build a little more equity before going to back to Stansbury and asking for more money for his assistants. He knew what he'd be working with when he took the job, and as far as I can tell, we're about in line with the average of the ACC <a href="http://www.sportsinfo.pro/MBBSurvey2017.html" target="_blank">(per this source)</a>. Granted - what Gregory's staff was getting would have been toward the bottom of the league. But there was an addition of about $200K to the budget for assistant coaches when Pastner came in. </p><p></p><p>I agree that I think the money could be raised, but the question is, does Stansbury see that as a necessary effort to compete right now? I think it may be tough to prove that point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ramblinwreck1378, post: 413011, member: 1108"] I think a big reason why they did that was because CPJ asked for it. He's got some clout being here 10+ years, and I think he was able to build a legitimate business case and present that to Stansbury. His selling point was essentially that we cannot compete with even middle of the pack P5 programs in terms of both quantity and quality of staff with the current budget. With Pastner still on his initial deal, he may have to build a little more equity before going to back to Stansbury and asking for more money for his assistants. He knew what he'd be working with when he took the job, and as far as I can tell, we're about in line with the average of the ACC [URL='http://www.sportsinfo.pro/MBBSurvey2017.html'](per this source)[/URL]. Granted - what Gregory's staff was getting would have been toward the bottom of the league. But there was an addition of about $200K to the budget for assistant coaches when Pastner came in. I agree that I think the money could be raised, but the question is, does Stansbury see that as a necessary effort to compete right now? I think it may be tough to prove that point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
GT Hoops Assistant Coaches Hot List
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top