Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT hires Chip Long as new OC/QBs Coach
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 852205" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>I feel like a chump for posting this</p><p></p><p>ESPN 2021 ACC QBR: <a href="https://www.espn.com/college-football/qbr/_/group/1" target="_blank">https://www.espn.com/college-football/qbr/_/group/1</a></p><p>Jeff Sims: 53.1</p><p></p><p>ESPN 2020 ACC QBR: <a href="https://www.espn.com/college-football/qbr/_/season/2020/group/1" target="_blank">https://www.espn.com/college-football/qbr/_/season/2020/group/1</a></p><p>Jeff Sims: 43.7</p><p></p><p>He didn't play UGA either year. 2020 was a weird year, but a naive interpretation is that he got better. </p><p></p><p>Before you say "well, he didn't play anybody", the QBRs are weighted based on competition. So, who you played is factored into the score. </p><p></p><p>It doesn't adjust for how well the rest of your offense played, so if you were getting sacked left and right, your QBR suffers. Life is not fair. </p><p></p><p>There's no "grade" associated with the ratings, but for argument's sake </p><p>< 50 : This is bad</p><p>50-60 : Unless your defense rocks, you aren't winning here. (Sims, Burmeister, etc.)</p><p>60-70 : This is fine</p><p>70-80: Really Good (this is where Sam Howell, Brennan Armstrong, and Devin Leary were this year)</p><p>80-90: You're getting drafted, probably in an early round. 2021 Heisman territory (Hartman, Van Dyke, Pickett, Cunningham)</p><p>90-100: Did not happen this year. Mac Jones and Justin Fields last year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 852205, member: 282"] I feel like a chump for posting this ESPN 2021 ACC QBR: [URL]https://www.espn.com/college-football/qbr/_/group/1[/URL] Jeff Sims: 53.1 ESPN 2020 ACC QBR: [URL]https://www.espn.com/college-football/qbr/_/season/2020/group/1[/URL] Jeff Sims: 43.7 He didn't play UGA either year. 2020 was a weird year, but a naive interpretation is that he got better. Before you say "well, he didn't play anybody", the QBRs are weighted based on competition. So, who you played is factored into the score. It doesn't adjust for how well the rest of your offense played, so if you were getting sacked left and right, your QBR suffers. Life is not fair. There's no "grade" associated with the ratings, but for argument's sake < 50 : This is bad 50-60 : Unless your defense rocks, you aren't winning here. (Sims, Burmeister, etc.) 60-70 : This is fine 70-80: Really Good (this is where Sam Howell, Brennan Armstrong, and Devin Leary were this year) 80-90: You're getting drafted, probably in an early round. 2021 Heisman territory (Hartman, Van Dyke, Pickett, Cunningham) 90-100: Did not happen this year. Mac Jones and Justin Fields last year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT hires Chip Long as new OC/QBs Coach
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top