Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT - Clemson postgame thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 15595" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>Okay, I know <em>everybody </em>loves my points per possession efficiency stat. </p><p></p><p>Before this last game:</p><p>GT O: 2.89 pts/drive; GT D: 1.57 ppd allowed</p><p>CU O: 2.60 PPD; CU D: 1.36 PPD allowed</p><p></p><p>This Game</p><p>GT: 2.21 PPD</p><p>CU: 4.23 PPD</p><p></p><p>In other words, although CU's D held us below our average PPD, we did more than 160% better than their D has allowed before our game.</p><p></p><p>In contrast, CU did more 270% better than our D had allowed. They scored on 9 of their 13 possessions. They ran 67 plays against our defense. Before that game, opposing offenses averaged 63 plays per game so it's not like they just beat us because our guys were tired. GT won the time of possession 34.5 min to 25.5 min. </p><p></p><p>I wonder/suspect (although I haven't gone back to look) that Clemson took advantage of hurry-up when we had personnel on the field that they felt they could exploit.</p><p></p><p>Imo, the tale of the game was Boyd and his receivers. He made some incredible throws when we had good coverage and made us pay we blew coverage. </p><p></p><p>We'll get them next year when our QB is more experienced and our D is healthier.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 15595, member: 195"] Okay, I know [I]everybody [/I]loves my points per possession efficiency stat. Before this last game: GT O: 2.89 pts/drive; GT D: 1.57 ppd allowed CU O: 2.60 PPD; CU D: 1.36 PPD allowed This Game GT: 2.21 PPD CU: 4.23 PPD In other words, although CU's D held us below our average PPD, we did more than 160% better than their D has allowed before our game. In contrast, CU did more 270% better than our D had allowed. They scored on 9 of their 13 possessions. They ran 67 plays against our defense. Before that game, opposing offenses averaged 63 plays per game so it's not like they just beat us because our guys were tired. GT won the time of possession 34.5 min to 25.5 min. I wonder/suspect (although I haven't gone back to look) that Clemson took advantage of hurry-up when we had personnel on the field that they felt they could exploit. Imo, the tale of the game was Boyd and his receivers. He made some incredible throws when we had good coverage and made us pay we blew coverage. We'll get them next year when our QB is more experienced and our D is healthier. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT - Clemson postgame thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top